• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对因刑事犯罪被还押候审的患有精神疾病的澳大利亚男性与未犯罪的患有精神疾病的社区男性群体进行的比较。

A comparison of Australian men with psychotic disorders remanded for criminal offences and a community group of psychotic men who have not offended.

作者信息

White Paul, Chant David, Whiteford Harvey

机构信息

Mental Health Policy and Economics Group (QCMHR) The Park--Centre for Mental Health, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;40(3):260-5. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01783.x.

DOI:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01783.x
PMID:16476154
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People remanded into custody by the courts have a substantially higher rate of severe mental disorder than other prisoners and the general population. Knowledge of their prevalence, needs and characteristics and an analysis of pathways to care may be necessary to provide mental health care effectively and efficiently. Previous prison studies focusing on psychotic offenders have suffered from the use of instruments not validated in a forensic setting and lack of a relevant comparison group.

METHOD

The Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis (DP) is a composite semi-structured standardized interview schedule. It combines social and demographic descriptors with measures of functioning adapted from the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS). The remand centre surveyed had 466 cells and is the main remand and reception centre for males for the southern region of the state of Queensland, Australia. Of the 621 men screened, 65 answered yes to at least one question in the DP and were interviewed.

RESULTS

Six hundred and twenty-one remandees were screened and of these 61 were interviewed as screened positive for psychotic disorder. Thirty-five per cent had been homeless for an average of 32 weeks during the previous year. Most had had little contact with families or close friends. Eighty-one per cent were receiving no treatment at the time of offence. Seventy-eight per cent were unemployed and in receipt of a pension. Eighty per cent were dependent on alcohol, cannabis or amphetamines. Statistical issues of power are detailed in the text.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplistic 'prison, hospital or community treatment' debate is misleading. Instead, the development of flexible preventative, management and accommodation services for people with severe mental disorder who have committed offences is a priority.

摘要

背景

被法庭还押候审的人患严重精神障碍的比例远高于其他囚犯和普通人群。了解他们的患病率、需求和特征,并分析护理途径,对于有效且高效地提供精神卫生保健可能是必要的。以往针对精神病罪犯的监狱研究存在一些问题,如使用未经法医环境验证的工具,且缺乏相关对照组。

方法

精神病诊断访谈(DP)是一种综合的半结构化标准化访谈程序。它将社会和人口统计学描述与从世界卫生组织残疾评估量表(DAS)改编而来的功能测量相结合。所调查的还押中心有466个牢房,是澳大利亚昆士兰州南部地区男性主要的还押和接待中心。在621名接受筛查的男性中,65人对DP中的至少一个问题回答为“是”并接受了访谈。

结果

对621名还押候审人员进行了筛查,其中61人因被筛查出精神病障碍呈阳性而接受访谈。35%的人在前一年平均有32周无家可归。大多数人与家人或亲密朋友很少联系。81%的人在犯罪时未接受任何治疗。78%的人失业且领取养老金。80%的人依赖酒精、大麻或安非他明。文中详细阐述了统计学效力问题。

结论

简单化的“监狱、医院或社区治疗”争论具有误导性。相反,为有犯罪行为的严重精神障碍患者开发灵活的预防、管理和住宿服务是当务之急。

相似文献

1
A comparison of Australian men with psychotic disorders remanded for criminal offences and a community group of psychotic men who have not offended.对因刑事犯罪被还押候审的患有精神疾病的澳大利亚男性与未犯罪的患有精神疾病的社区男性群体进行的比较。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;40(3):260-5. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01783.x.
2
Psychotic men remanded in custody to Brixton Prison.患有精神病的男性被还押候审,关押在布里克斯顿监狱。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;164(1):55-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.164.1.55.
3
Substance use and treatment seeking in young offenders on community orders.处于社区监管令之下的青少年罪犯的物质使用及寻求治疗情况。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Dec;31(4):425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.05.017. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
4
An examination of the relationship of homelessness to mental disorder, criminal behaviour, and health care in a pretrial jail population.对审前监狱人群中无家可归与精神障碍、犯罪行为及医疗保健之间关系的一项调查。
Can J Psychiatry. 1996 Sep;41(7):435-40. doi: 10.1177/070674379604100708.
5
Remands and psychiatric assessments in Holloway Prison. I: The psychotic population.
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;163:634-40. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.5.634.
6
Socio-demographic characteristics as correlates of psychological distress.社会人口学特征与心理困扰的相关性
Int J Prison Health. 2018 Sep 10;14(3):210-219. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-10-2017-0042.
7
Treatment prospects for persons with severe mental illness in an urban county jail.城市县级监狱中重症精神疾病患者的治疗前景。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jun;58(6):782-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.782.
8
Criminal and psychiatric histories of Finnish arsonists.芬兰纵火犯的犯罪和精神病史。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Apr;95(4):318-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09638.x.
9
Outcome of referral to a prison mental health team.转介至监狱心理健康团队的结果。
Med Sci Law. 2006 Oct;46(4):321-7. doi: 10.1258/rsmmsl.46.4.321.
10
Psychosis in German prisoners: Comparison of the clinical appearance of psychotic disorder of an imprisoned population with a not detained community group.德国囚犯的精神病:监禁人群的精神病障碍的临床特征与未被监禁的社区人群的比较。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Sep;38(5):482-492. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2480. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
European violence risk and mental disorders (EU-VIORMED): a multi-centre prospective cohort study protocol.欧洲暴力风险与精神障碍研究(EU-VIORMED):一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2379-x.
2
The reliability and validity of the forensic Camberwell Assessment of Need (CANFOR): a needs assessment for forensic mental health service users.法医坎伯韦尔需求评估量表(CANFOR)的信度和效度:一项针对法医精神卫生服务使用者的需求评估
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008;17(2):111-20. doi: 10.1002/mpr.235.