Mathers Margaret E
University of Newcastle, School of Language, Callaghan NSW, Australia.
J Atten Disord. 2006 Feb;9(3):523-33. doi: 10.1177/1087054705282437.
This article reports some outcomes from an exploratory study that compares children diagnosed with ADHD and without language impairment with typically developing children for aspects of language use. Discourse analysis based on a systemic functional linguistics approach is applied to spoken and written samples from three different text types that are supplied by 11 children diagnosed with ADHD and 11 typically developing children. Comparisons of multiple variables most often show differences in use between the groups. Closer examination of these differences shows that relative to the controls, the ADHD group uses fewer strategies of textual organization and more avoidance, tangential, and unrelated meanings and more abandoned utterances and spelling and punctuation errors. Clinical implications suggest that careful linguistic analysis of spoken and written language of children with ADHD cannot only identify the linguistic resources they use within everyday contexts but may also indicate areas where intervention may be beneficial.
本文报告了一项探索性研究的一些结果,该研究将被诊断为注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)且无语言障碍的儿童与发育正常的儿童在语言使用方面进行了比较。基于系统功能语言学方法的语篇分析应用于11名被诊断为ADHD的儿童和11名发育正常的儿童提供的三种不同文本类型的口语和书面样本。多个变量的比较最常显示出两组之间在使用上的差异。对这些差异的仔细检查表明,相对于对照组,ADHD组使用的文本组织策略较少,更多地使用回避、离题和无关的含义,以及更多的废弃话语、拼写和标点错误。临床意义表明,对ADHD儿童的口语和书面语言进行仔细的语言分析,不仅可以识别他们在日常语境中使用的语言资源,还可能指出干预可能有益的领域。