Bialystok Ellen, Hawrylewicz Kornelia, Wiseheart Melody, Toplak Maggie
York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Biling (Camb Engl). 2017 May;20(3):588-601. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000887. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
One hundred and sixty-eight young adult participants were classified as monolingual or bilingual and as having a previously reported clinical diagnosis of ADHD or not to create four groups. All participants completed tests of language proficiency, ADHD ratings, and executive control. Both bilingualism and ADHD are generally associated with poorer vocabulary knowledge, but bilingualism and ADHD are associated with opposite effects on executive control. Consistent with this literature, bilinguals performed more poorly than monolinguals on the vocabulary test but contrary to predictions, the ADHD group performed somewhat better on language ability than the non-ADHD group, attesting to their high functioning status. For the flanker task, both bilinguals and non-ADHD participants showed less cost in performing in the conflict condition than in the baseline condition. For the stop-signal task, ADHD status interfered more with performance by bilinguals than monolinguals, suggesting a greater burden of ADHD on executive function for this group.
168名年轻成人参与者被分为单语或双语,以及之前是否有ADHD临床诊断,从而形成四组。所有参与者都完成了语言能力测试、ADHD评分和执行控制测试。双语和ADHD通常都与较差的词汇知识有关,但双语和ADHD对执行控制有相反的影响。与该文献一致,双语者在词汇测试中的表现比单语者更差,但与预测相反,ADHD组在语言能力方面的表现比非ADHD组略好,证明了他们的高功能状态。在侧翼任务中,双语者和非ADHD参与者在冲突条件下的表现成本都比基线条件下低。在停止信号任务中,ADHD状态对双语者表现的干扰比对单语者更大,这表明ADHD对该组执行功能的负担更大。