Essig Marco, Lodemann Klaus-Peter, Le-Huu Martin, Brüning Roland, Kirchin Miles, Reith Wolfgang
Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Invest Radiol. 2006 Mar;41(3):256-63. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000191333.19068.6b.
The objective of this study was to compare 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg body weight (bw) doses gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA; MultiHance) and gadobutrol (Gd-BT-DO3A; Gadovist) for cerebral perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T.
Twelve healthy male volunteers enrolled into a randomized intraindividual comparative study underwent 4 perfusion MR imaging examinations with 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg bw doses of each contrast agent. The imaging parameters, slice positioning, and contrast agent application were highly standardized. Quantitative determinations based on signal intensity/time (SI/T) curves at regions of interest (ROI) on the gray and white matter were made of the regional cerebral blood volume and flow (rCBV and rCBF, respectively), the percentage signal drop, and the full width half maximum (FWHM) of the SI/T curve. Qualitative evaluation of the quality of the rCBV and rCBF maps was assessed by an independent offsite blinded reader.
A single dose of both agents was sufficient to achieve high-quality, diagnostically valid perfusion maps at 1.5 T, and no significant benefit for one agent over the other was noted for quantitative or qualitative determinations. The susceptibility effect, described by percentage of signal loss (gadobutrol: 29.4% vs gadobenate dimeglumine: 28.3%) and the FWHM (gadobutrol: 6.4 seconds vs gadobenate dimeglumine: 7.0 seconds) were similar for 0.1 mmol/kg bw doses of the 2 agents. Double doses of the 2 agents produced better overall image quality but no clinical benefit over the single-dose examinations.
Both the 1 molar MR contrast agent gadobutrol and the weak protein-interacting agent gadobenate dimeglumine permit the acquisition of high-quality perfusion maps at doses of 0.1 mmol/kg bw. The susceptibility effect is comparable for both agents and stronger than for conventional MR contrast agents.
本研究的目的是比较剂量为0.1和0.2 mmol/kg体重(bw)的钆贝葡胺(Gd - BOPTA;MultiHance)和钆布醇(Gd - BT - DO3A;Gadovist)用于1.5 T场强下的脑灌注磁共振(MR)成像。
12名健康男性志愿者参加了一项随机个体内对比研究,接受了4次灌注MR成像检查,每次使用0.1和0.2 mmol/kg bw剂量的每种造影剂。成像参数、层面定位和造影剂应用均高度标准化。基于灰质和白质感兴趣区(ROI)的信号强度/时间(SI/T)曲线,对局部脑血容量和血流(分别为rCBV和rCBF)进行定量测定,包括信号下降百分比和SI/T曲线的半高宽(FWHM)。由一名独立的非现场盲法阅片者对rCBV和rCBF图的质量进行定性评估。
单剂量的两种造影剂均足以在1.5 T场场强场强下获得高质量、具有诊断价值的灌注图,在定量或定性测定中,未发现一种造影剂相对于另一种造影剂有显著优势。对于0.1 mmol/kg bw剂量的两种造影剂,由信号损失百分比(钆布醇:29.4% vs钆贝葡胺:28.3%)和FWHM(钆布醇:6.4秒vs钆贝葡胺:7.0秒)所描述的磁化率效应相似。双倍剂量的两种造影剂产生了更好的整体图像质量,但与单剂量检查相比无临床优势。
1摩尔的MR造影剂钆布醇和弱蛋白相互作用剂钆贝葡胺在剂量为0.1 mmol/kg bw时均能获得高质量的灌注图。两种造影剂的磁化率效应相当,且比传统MR造影剂更强。