Haspeslagh Sara R S, Van Suijlekom Hans A, Lamé Inge E, Kessels Alfons G H, van Kleef Maarten, Weber Wim E J
Dept. Anesthesiology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2006 Feb 16;6:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-6-1.
Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is a unilateral headache localised in the neck or occipital region, projecting to the frontal and temporal regions. Since the pathogenesis of this syndrome appears to have an anatomical basis in the cervical region, several surgical procedures aimed at reducing the nociceptive input on the cervical level, have been tested. We developed a sequence of various cervical radiofrequency neurotomies (facet joint denervations eventually followed by upper dorsal root ganglion neurotomies) that proved successful in a prospective pilot trial with 15 CEH patients. To further evaluate this sequential treatment program we conducted a randomised controlled trial
30 patients with cervicogenic headache according to the Sjaastad diagnostic criteria, were randomised. 15 patients received a sequence of radiofrequency treatments (cervical facet joint denervation, followed by cervical dorsal root ganglion lesions when necessary), and the other 15 patients underwent local injections with steroid and anaesthetic at the greater occipital nerve, followed by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) when necessary. Visual analogue scores for pain, global perceived effects scores, quality of life scores were assessed at 8, 16, 24 and 48 weeks. Patients also kept a headache diary.
There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups at any time point in the trial.
We did not find evidence that radiofrequency treatment of cervical facet joints and upper dorsal root ganglions is a better treatment than the infiltration of the greater occipital nerve, followed by TENS for patients fulfilling the clinical criteria of cervicogenic headache.
颈源性头痛(CEH)是一种单侧头痛,局限于颈部或枕部区域,并向前额和颞部区域放射。由于该综合征的发病机制似乎在颈部区域有解剖学基础,因此已经测试了几种旨在减少颈部水平伤害性输入的外科手术。我们开发了一系列不同的颈部射频神经切断术(最终是小关节去神经支配,随后是上背根神经节神经切断术),在一项针对15例CEH患者的前瞻性试点试验中证明是成功的。为了进一步评估这个序贯治疗方案,我们进行了一项随机对照试验。
根据Sjaastad诊断标准,将30例颈源性头痛患者随机分组。15例患者接受一系列射频治疗(颈部小关节去神经支配,必要时进行颈背根神经节损伤),另外15例患者在枕大神经处进行类固醇和麻醉剂局部注射,必要时进行经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)。在第8、16、24和48周评估疼痛的视觉模拟评分、总体感知效果评分、生活质量评分。患者还记录头痛日记。
在试验的任何时间点,两个治疗组之间均无统计学显著差异。
对于符合颈源性头痛临床标准的患者,我们没有发现证据表明颈部小关节和上背根神经节的射频治疗比枕大神经浸润加TENS治疗更好。