Houshian Shirzad, Seyedipour Sedigheh, Wedderkopp Niels
Department of Orthopaedics, Hand Section, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Int J Infect Dis. 2006 Jul;10(4):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2005.06.009. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
The aim of the study was to delineate and update the bacteriological spectrum, characterize patterns and sites of injury, evaluate laboratory tests and possible causes of complications in patients with bacterial hand infections.
All hand infections operated on in the department of orthopedics at Odense University Hospital during the period 1992-2001 were reviewed retrospectively. A standard protocol was used to collect data for each patient. We also examined all laboratory reports and recorded the identity of the etiologic organism, if known, for all cases of bacterial hand infections.
Four hundred and eighteen patients (296 men and 122 women) with hand infections were operated on between 1992 and 2001 in our department. The median age of the patients was 40 years (range 1-93). The average interval from primary injury to operation was 10 days (range 1-50). The etiology was laceration/puncture in 35%. The site of infection was subcutaneous in 45% followed by tendon, joint and bone in 27, 18 and 5%, respectively. The bacteria isolated from the patients showed that 184 cultures (44%) were pure Staphylococcus aureus followed by 49 cultures (11.7%) of mixed organisms. Body temperature and C-reactive protein (CRP) were normal in three quarters of all patients with hand infections in our series. However the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was elevated in 50% of the patients and was a significantly better test for infection in this study than CRP (p = 0.002). Neither the severity of infection nor the etiology of infection was related in any way to the initial temperature, CRP or ESR in this study. Complications were noted in 14.8% of all patients, and were especially related to diabetes, and mixed infection.
Despite modern antibiotics, hand infections with a variety of organisms continue to be a source of morbidity and possible long-term disability. Most hand infections are the result of minor wounds that have been neglected. A complete history and physical examination is necessary to exclude other associated medical conditions (diabetes, arthritis, immunosuppression) that may compromise therapy. Furthermore, our study confirms that Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for most instances of hand infection, followed by mixed organisms. Gram-negative organisms are frequently cultured in patients with diabetes and intravenous drug abuse.
本研究旨在明确并更新手部细菌感染患者的细菌谱,描述损伤模式和部位,评估实验室检查以及并发症的可能原因。
对1992年至2001年期间在欧登塞大学医院骨科接受手术治疗的所有手部感染患者进行回顾性研究。采用标准方案收集每位患者的数据。我们还查阅了所有实验室报告,并记录了所有手部细菌感染病例中已知的病原体种类。
1992年至2001年期间,我们科室共对418例手部感染患者(296例男性和122例女性)进行了手术。患者的中位年龄为40岁(范围1 - 93岁)。从初次受伤到手术的平均间隔时间为10天(范围1 - 50天)。病因是撕裂伤/刺伤的占35%。感染部位为皮下的占45%,其次是肌腱、关节和骨骼,分别占27%、18%和5%。从患者分离出的细菌显示,184份培养物(44%)为纯金黄色葡萄球菌,其次是49份混合菌培养物(11.7%)。在我们的系列研究中,四分之三的手部感染患者体温和C反应蛋白(CRP)正常。然而,50%的患者红细胞沉降率(ESR)升高,在本研究中ESR对感染的检测效果明显优于CRP(p = 0.002)。在本研究中,感染的严重程度和感染病因与初始体温、CRP或ESR均无任何关联。14.8%的患者出现了并发症,尤其与糖尿病和混合感染有关。
尽管有现代抗生素,多种病原体引起的手部感染仍然是发病和可能导致长期残疾的一个原因。大多数手部感染是由被忽视的小伤口引起的。完整的病史和体格检查对于排除可能影响治疗的其他相关疾病(糖尿病、关节炎、免疫抑制)是必要的。此外,我们的研究证实,金黄色葡萄球菌是大多数手部感染病例的病原体,其次是混合菌。革兰氏阴性菌在糖尿病患者和静脉药物滥用者中经常培养出来。