Dodoo D K, Quagraine E K, Okai-Sam F, Kambo Dorsa J, Headley J V
Department of Chemistry, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41(3):329-42. doi: 10.1080/10934520500423238.
To determine the quality of sachet water samples in the Cape Coast municipality of Ghana, random sampling procedures were used to collect 180 samples from 29 brands produced in the municipality from 1999 to 2004. For any particular year, each tested brand was sampled three times at intervals of not less than 2 weeks (usually monthly) between the months of March to June. Forty-five percent (45%) of the brands subjected to bacteriological examination contained coliform bacteria for one sampling period or another during the period of investigation. The coliform contamination seemed to be more prevalent with some particular brands. Three out of seven brands examined in 2004 also recorded the presence of E. coli. Exceedances were recorded for WHO drinking water quality guidelines for pH (6.25-7.93) in 2002 and for conductivity (67-306 microS cm(-1)) in 2002 and 2004. Total hardness values for all sachet water brands were less than 100 mg/l CaCO(3) and therefore below the WHO limit for potable water. None of the samples seems to pose any health dangers as far as the major cations; sodium (17.4-19.1 mg/l), potassium (5.7-6.2 mg/l), calcium (8.0-24.0 mg/l) and magnesium (19.9-50 mg/l) are concern. Apart from nitrite, for which some exceedances were recorded and phosphate which does not have an established WHO guideline, the measured major anions (i.e., chloride: 1.57-37.7 mg/l, sulfate: 0.33-44.33 mg/l and nitrates: 0.005-0.70 mg/l) were within the WHO drinking water guideline. No exceedances were also recorded for iron and lead. In general, the high quality claimed for sachet waters could not be confirmed based on the measured physico-chemical and bacteriological properties. The variable quality and in some cases, poor water quality observed, likely reflects the fact that the sachets are not always bagged under scrutinized sanitary conditions.
为测定加纳海岸角市袋装水样本的质量,采用随机抽样程序从该市1999年至2004年生产的29个品牌中采集了180个样本。对于任何特定年份,在3月至6月期间,每个受测品牌每隔不少于2周(通常为每月)采样3次。在调查期间,接受细菌学检查的品牌中有45%在一个或另一个采样期内含有大肠菌群。大肠菌群污染在某些特定品牌中似乎更为普遍。2004年检测的7个品牌中有3个也检测出了大肠杆菌。2002年pH值(6.25 - 7.93)以及2002年和2004年电导率(67 - 306微西门子/厘米)超出了世界卫生组织饮用水质量准则。所有袋装水品牌的总硬度值均小于100毫克/升碳酸钙(CaCO₃),因此低于世界卫生组织饮用水限值。就主要阳离子而言,钠(17.4 - 19.1毫克/升)、钾(5.7 - 6.2毫克/升)、钙(8.0 - 24.0毫克/升)和镁(19.9 - 50毫克/升),似乎没有任何一个样本会对健康构成威胁。除了有一些超标记录的亚硝酸盐以及没有既定世界卫生组织准则的磷酸盐外,所测主要阴离子(即氯化物:1.57 - 37.7毫克/升、硫酸盐:0.33 - 44.33毫克/升和硝酸盐:0.005 - 0.70毫克/升)均在世界卫生组织饮用水准则范围内。铁和铅也没有超标记录。总体而言,根据所测理化和细菌学特性,无法证实袋装水所宣称的高质量。观察到的质量参差不齐,在某些情况下水质较差,这可能反映出袋装过程并非总是在严格的卫生条件下进行。