Matvey Greg, Dunlosky John, Schwartz Bennett L
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA.
Memory. 2006 Feb;14(2):253-61. doi: 10.1080/09658210500216844.
On-line monitoring during study can be influenced by the relatedness shared between the cue and target of a paired associate. We examined the effects on people's judgements of learning (JOLs) of a different kind of relatedness, which occurs in a list organised into sets of categorically related words and unrelated words. In two experiments, participants studied a list of words organised into a series of sets of four categorically related words or four unrelated words. In Experiment 1, JOLs were made immediately after each word had been studied, and JOL magnitude was greater for related than unrelated words. In Experiment 2, JOLs were delayed after study and, as expected, they were substantially greater for related sets of words. Serial position effects (an increase in JOL magnitude across the words of a related set) were evident with immediate JOLs but not with delayed JOLs. The relatedness effect was not present early in the list for immediate JOLs but was present throughout the list for delayed JOLs. We conclude by discussing some preliminary explanations for these new phenomena.
在研究过程中的在线监测可能会受到配对联想中线索与目标之间共享的关联性的影响。我们考察了另一种关联性对人们学习判断(JOLs)的影响,这种关联性出现在一个由分类相关词集和不相关词集组成的列表中。在两项实验中,参与者学习一个由一系列四个分类相关词集或四个不相关词集组成的单词列表。在实验1中,每个单词学习后立即进行JOLs判断,相关单词的JOL量级大于不相关单词。在实验2中,JOLs在学习后延迟进行,正如预期的那样,相关词集的JOLs明显更大。即时JOLs时存在系列位置效应(相关词集的单词中JOL量级增加),但延迟JOLs时不存在。即时JOLs时列表开头不存在关联性效应,但延迟JOLs时整个列表都存在。我们通过讨论这些新现象的一些初步解释来得出结论。