Feng S, Roethig H J, Liang Q, Kinser R, Jin Y, Scherer G, Urban M, Engl J, Riedel K
Philip Morris USA, Research Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Biomarkers. 2006 Jan-Feb;11(1):28-52. doi: 10.1080/13547500500399730.
The objective was to evaluate the utility of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP), S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA), trans,trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA), 3-methyladenine (3-MeAd), 3-ethyladenine (3-EtAd), 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and thioethers as biomarkers for assessing the exposure in adult smokers who switched from smoking conventional cigarettes to candidate potential reduced exposure products (PREP) or who stopped smoking. Two electrically heated smoking systems (EHCSS) were used as prototype cigarettes that have significant reductions in a number of mainstream smoke constituents as measured by smoking machines relative to those from conventional cigarettes. Urine samples were collected from a randomized, controlled, forced-switching study in which 110 adult smokers of a conventional cigarette brand (CC1) were randomly assigned to five study groups. The groups included the CC1 smoking group, a lower-tar conventional cigarette (CC2) smoking group, EHCSS1 group, EHCSS2 group and a no smoking group that were monitored for 8 days. Biomarkers were measured at baseline and day 8. The daily excretion levels of these biomarkers were compared among the groups before and after switching, and the relationships between the daily excretion levels of these biomarkers and cigarette smoking-related exposure were investigated using Pearson product-moment correlation and multiple regression analyses. It was concluded that under controlled study conditions: (1) 1-OHP, S-PMA and t,t-MA are useful biomarkers that could differentiate exposure between smoking conventional and EHCSS cigarettes or between smoking conventional cigarettes and no smoking; between S-PMA and t,t-MA, the former appeared to be more sensitive; (2) 3-MeAd could only differentiate between smoking conventional cigarettes and no smoking; the results for 3-EtAd were not conclusive because contradictory results were observed; (3) 8-OHdG had a questionable association with smoking and therefore the utility of this biomarker for smoking-related exposure could not be established; and (4) urinary excretion of thioethers as a biomarker lacked sensitivity to demonstrate a clear dose-response relationship in conventional cigarette smokers, although it could differentiate the excretion levels between those subjects who smoked a conventional cigarette and those who stopped smoking.
目的是评估尿中1-羟基芘(1-OHP)、S-苯基巯基尿酸(S-PMA)、反式,反式-粘康酸(t,t-MA)、3-甲基腺嘌呤(3-MeAd)、3-乙基腺嘌呤(3-EtAd)、8-羟基-2'-脱氧鸟苷(8-OHdG)和硫醚作为生物标志物的效用,以评估从吸传统香烟转而使用候选潜在低暴露产品(PREP)或戒烟的成年吸烟者的暴露情况。两种电加热吸烟系统(EHCSS)被用作原型香烟,通过吸烟机测量,其主流烟雾中的多种成分相对于传统香烟有显著减少。尿液样本取自一项随机、对照、强制转换研究,该研究将110名吸传统香烟品牌(CC1)的成年吸烟者随机分为五个研究组。这些组包括CC1吸烟组、低焦油传统香烟(CC2)吸烟组、EHCSS1组、EHCSS2组和一个不吸烟组,对其进行了8天的监测。在基线和第8天测量生物标志物。比较了转换前后各组这些生物标志物的每日排泄水平,并使用Pearson积矩相关和多元回归分析研究了这些生物标志物的每日排泄水平与吸烟相关暴露之间的关系。得出的结论是,在对照研究条件下:(1)1-OHP、S-PMA和t,t-MA是有用的生物标志物,可区分吸传统香烟与EHCSS香烟之间或吸传统香烟与不吸烟之间的暴露情况;在S-PMA和t,t-MA之间,前者似乎更敏感;(2)3-MeAd只能区分吸传统香烟与不吸烟;3-EtAd的结果不具有决定性,因为观察到了相互矛盾的结果;(3)8-OHdG与吸烟的关联存在疑问,因此无法确定该生物标志物在吸烟相关暴露方面的效用;(4)硫醚作为生物标志物的尿排泄缺乏敏感性,无法在传统香烟吸烟者中显示出明确的剂量反应关系,尽管它可以区分吸传统香烟者和戒烟者的排泄水平。