• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的“标准操作程序”在感染性休克中的实施及结果

Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock.

作者信息

Kortgen Andreas, Niederprüm Petra, Bauer Michael

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):943-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206112.32673.D4.

DOI:10.1097/01.CCM.0000206112.32673.D4
PMID:16484902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of an algorithm defining resuscitation according to early goal-directed therapy, glycemic control, administration of stress doses of hydrocortisone, and use of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) on measures of organ dysfunction and outcome in septic shock.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary ten-bed intensive care unit of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixty patients were analyzed: 30 consecutive patients fulfilling criteria for diagnosis of septic shock, treated from September 2002 until December 2003 after implementation of a standard operating procedure (SOP) for severe sepsis and septic shock; and 30 patients with septic shock treated from January until August 2002 in the same unit, who served as controls.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Data for blood gas analysis, lactate, glucose, serum creatinine, bilirubin, white blood cells, platelets, and C-reactive protein were obtained from patient files on admission or at time of diagnosis of septic shock and at 7:00 a.m. on days 2 and 4; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were calculated and 28-day survival was assessed. With implementation of the SOP, use of dobutamine (12/30 vs. 2/30), insulin (blood glucose <150 mg/dL, day 4: 26/28 vs. 13/25), hydrocortisone (30/30 vs. 13/30), and rhAPC (7/30 vs. 0/30) significantly increased, whereas volume for resuscitation and use of packed red blood cells were unaffected. Mortality was 53% in the historical control group and 27% after implementation of the SOP (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The combined approach of early goal-directed therapy, intensive insulin therapy, hydrocortisone administration, and additional application of rhAPC in selected cases seems to favorably influence outcome. The implementation of a "sepsis bundle" can be facilitated by a standardized protocol while significantly reducing the time until the defined therapeutic measures are realized in daily practice.

摘要

目的

评估一种根据早期目标导向治疗、血糖控制、应激剂量氢化可的松的使用以及重组人活化蛋白C(rhAPC)定义复苏的算法对脓毒性休克患者器官功能障碍指标和预后的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一所大学医院的拥有十张床位的多学科重症监护病房。

患者

分析了60例患者:30例连续符合脓毒性休克诊断标准的患者,于2002年9月至2003年12月在实施严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克标准操作程序(SOP)后接受治疗;以及2002年1月至8月在同一科室接受治疗的30例脓毒性休克患者,作为对照组。

测量与结果

从患者入院时或脓毒性休克诊断时以及第2天和第4天上午7点的病历中获取血气分析、乳酸、血糖、血清肌酐、胆红素、白细胞、血小板和C反应蛋白的数据;计算序贯器官衰竭评估分数并评估28天生存率。随着SOP的实施,多巴酚丁胺(12/30对2/30)、胰岛素(血糖<150mg/dL,第4天:26/28对13/25)、氢化可的松(30/30对13/30)和rhAPC(7/30对0/30)的使用显著增加,而复苏液体量和浓缩红细胞的使用未受影响。历史对照组的死亡率为53%,SOP实施后的死亡率为27%(p<.05)。

结论

早期目标导向治疗、强化胰岛素治疗、氢化可的松给药以及在特定病例中额外应用rhAPC的联合方法似乎对预后有有利影响。标准化方案有助于实施“脓毒症集束化治疗”,同时显著缩短在日常实践中实现既定治疗措施所需的时间。

相似文献

1
Implementation of an evidence-based "standard operating procedure" and outcome in septic shock.基于证据的“标准操作程序”在感染性休克中的实施及结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):943-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206112.32673.D4.
2
Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol.多重紧急脓毒症治疗(MUST)方案的实施与结果
Crit Care Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):1025-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206104.18647.A8.
3
Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科早期目标导向治疗、皮质类固醇及重组人活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
4
Time- and fluid-sensitive resuscitation for hemodynamic support of children in septic shock: barriers to the implementation of the American College of Critical Care Medicine/Pediatric Advanced Life Support Guidelines in a pediatric intensive care unit in a developing world.脓毒性休克患儿血流动力学支持的时间和液体敏感性复苏:在发展中国家一家儿科重症监护病房实施美国危重病医学会/儿科高级生命支持指南的障碍
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Dec;24(12):810-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31818e9f3a.
5
Before-after study of a standardized hospital order set for the management of septic shock.关于脓毒性休克管理的标准化医院医嘱集的前后对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2707-13. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000241151.25426.D7.
6
Temporal changes in management and outcome of septic shock in patients with malignancies in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中恶性肿瘤患者感染性休克的管理及结局的时间变化
Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):690-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E318165314B.
7
A modified goal-directed protocol improves clinical outcomes in intensive care unit patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.一种改良的目标导向方案可改善重症监护病房感染性休克患者的临床结局:一项随机对照试验。
Shock. 2006 Dec;26(6):551-7. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000232271.09440.8f.
8
Practice and perception--a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis.实践与认知——一项关于脓毒症治疗习惯的全国性调查
Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2719-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3.
9
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.大学医院医学重症监护病房314例脓毒症发作的生存分析:重症监护病房性能及抗菌治疗的影响
Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97.
10
[The impact of sepsis bundles on mortality in patients with sepsis shock: a prospective clinical study].[脓毒症集束化治疗对脓毒症休克患者死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Sep;20(9):534-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring medicine classification and accessibility: a qualitative study.探索药物分类与可及性:一项定性研究
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 4;18(1):2426137. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2426137. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of implementation methods in sepsis: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 2 trial.脓毒症实施方法评估:一项集群随机化混合 2 型试验研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Sep 29;24(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07644-y.
3
Association between the volume of fluid resuscitation and mortality modified by disease severity in patients with sepsis in ICU: a retrospective cohort study.
在 ICU 中患有脓毒症的患者中,液体复苏量与死亡率的关系受疾病严重程度的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;13(4):e066056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066056.
4
Effect of ICU care bundles on long-term patient-relevant outcomes: a scoping review.ICU 护理包对长期与患者相关结局的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 17;13(2):e070962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070962.
5
Impact of 1-hour and 3-hour sepsis time bundles on patient outcomes and antimicrobial use: A before and after cohort study.1小时和3小时脓毒症时间集束对患者预后及抗菌药物使用的影响:一项前后队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Nov 2;18:100305. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100305. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Segmented regression analysis of emergency departments patient visits from Septicemia in Taiwan.台湾地区败血症急诊患者就诊情况的分段回归分析。
Health Policy Technol. 2018 Jun;7(2):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Web-Based Dashboard for the Interactive Visualization and Analysis of National Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates of Sepsis in the US.基于网络的美国脓毒症国家风险标准化死亡率交互式可视化和分析仪表板。
J Med Syst. 2020 Jan 11;44(2):54. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1509-9.
8
Assessment of early goal-directed therapy guideline adherence: Balancing clinical importance and feasibility.评估早期目标导向治疗指南的依从性:平衡临床重要性和可行性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 15;14(3):e0213802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213802. eCollection 2019.
9
An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis.电子预警系统有助于缩短脓毒症的诊断时间。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):414-422. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180059. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
10
The impact of a multifaceted intervention including sepsis electronic alert system and sepsis response team on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock.包括脓毒症电子警报系统和脓毒症应对小组在内的多方面干预措施对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0280-7. Epub 2017 May 30.