Suppr超能文献

从基于专家的评估到索德伯格铝冶炼厂的定量回顾性暴露评估。

From expert-based to quantitative retrospective exposure assessment at a Soderberg aluminum smelter.

作者信息

Friesen M C, Demers P A, Spinelli J J, LE N D

机构信息

Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 2-111, 675 West 10th, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L3.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2006 Jun;50(4):359-70. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel003. Epub 2006 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Expert judgement of exposure levels is often only poorly or moderately correlated with directly measured levels. For a follow-up of a historical cohort study at a Söderberg aluminum smelter we updated an expert-based semiquantitative job exposure matrix of coal tar pitch volatiles (CTPV) to quantitative estimates of CTPV and benzo(a)pyrene (BaP).

METHODS

Mixed effects models to predict exposure for potroom operation and maintenance jobs were constructed from personal CTPV and BaP measurements. Mean exposures of jobs in non-potroom locations were directly calculated when measurements were available. Exposure estimates for jobs/time periods with no measurements were based on proportion of time spent in exposed areas compared to jobs where exposure was modeled or measured. For pre-1977, the original expert exposure assignments were calibrated using the updated 1977 estimates.

RESULTS

The rate of change in exposure levels varied by time period and was accounted for in mixed models with a linear spline time trend. Other variables significant in the models were job, potroom group and season as fixed effects, and worker as a random effect. The models for potroom operations explained 45 and 27% of the variability in the CTPV and BaP measurements, respectively. The models for maintenance jobs explained 40 and 19% of the variability in the CTPV and BaP measurements, respectively. For 1977-2000 model estimates, direct calculation of means and extrapolation from modeled/measured exposures accounted for 57, 6 and 37% of the exposed person-years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The above methodology maximized the use of exposure measurements and largely replaced the original expert-based estimates. Finer discrimination between exposure levels was possible with the updated exposure assessment. The new estimates are expected to reduce exposure misclassification and help better assess the exposure-response relationships.

摘要

目的

专家对暴露水平的判断往往与直接测量的水平之间只有较弱或中等程度的相关性。为了对一家 Söderberg 铝冶炼厂的历史性队列研究进行随访,我们将基于专家的煤焦油沥青挥发物(CTPV)半定量工作暴露矩阵更新为 CTPV 和苯并(a)芘(BaP)的定量估计值。

方法

根据个人 CTPV 和 BaP 测量值构建混合效应模型,以预测电解车间操作和维护工作的暴露情况。当有测量数据时,直接计算非电解车间岗位工作的平均暴露量。对于没有测量数据的工作/时间段的暴露估计,是基于在暴露区域花费的时间比例与建模或测量暴露的工作相比得出的。对于 1977 年以前的情况,使用更新后的 1977 年估计值对原始专家暴露赋值进行校准。

结果

暴露水平的变化率随时间段而变化,并在具有线性样条时间趋势的混合模型中得到体现。模型中其他显著的变量包括工作、电解车间组和季节作为固定效应,以及工人作为随机效应。电解车间操作模型分别解释了 CTPV 和 BaP 测量值变异性的 45%和 27%。维护工作模型分别解释了 CTPV 和 BaP 测量值变异性的 40%和 19%。对于 1977 - 2000 年的模型估计,直接计算平均值以及从建模/测量暴露进行外推分别占暴露人年数的 57%、6%和 37%。

结论

上述方法最大限度地利用了暴露测量值,并在很大程度上取代了原来基于专家的估计值。通过更新后的暴露评估,可以更精细地区分暴露水平。新的估计值有望减少暴露错误分类,并有助于更好地评估暴露 - 反应关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验