Baum Amber E, Solberg Leah C, Churchill Gary A, Ahmadiyeh Nasim, Takahashi Joseph S, Redei Eva E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Behav Brain Res. 2006 May 15;169(2):220-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
Inbred Wistar-Kyoto rats consistently display hypoactivity in tests of emotional behavior. We used them to test the hypothesis that the genetic factors underlying the behavioral decision-making process will vary in different environmental contexts. The contexts used were the open-field test (OFT), a novel environment with no explicit threats present, and the defensive-burying test (DB), a habituated environment into which a threat has been introduced. Rearing, a voluntary behavior was measured in both tests, and our study was the first to look for genetic loci affecting grooming, a relatively automatic, stress-responsive stereotyped behavior. Quantitative trait locus analysis was performed on a population of 486 F2 animals bred from reciprocal inter-crosses. The genetic architectures of DB and OFT rearing, and of DB and OFT grooming, were compared. There were no common loci affecting grooming behavior in both tests. These different contexts produced the stereotyped behavior via different pathways, and genetic factors seem to influence the decision-making pathways and not the expression of the behavior. Three loci were found that affected rearing behavior in both tests. However, in both contexts, other loci had greater effects on the behavior. Our results imply that environmental context's effects on decision-making vary depending on the category of behavior.
近交系Wistar-Kyoto大鼠在情绪行为测试中始终表现出活动减少。我们用它们来检验这样一个假设,即行为决策过程背后的遗传因素在不同的环境背景下会有所不同。所使用的环境背景是旷场试验(OFT),这是一个没有明显威胁的新环境,以及防御性埋土试验(DB),这是一个引入了威胁的习惯化环境。在这两种试验中都测量了一种自发行为——理毛,并且我们的研究是首次寻找影响理毛的基因位点,理毛是一种相对自动的、应激反应性的刻板行为。对由正反交培育的486只F2动物群体进行了数量性状位点分析。比较了DB和OFT理毛以及DB和OFT饲养的遗传结构。在这两种试验中没有共同影响理毛行为的基因位点。这些不同的环境背景通过不同的途径产生刻板行为,并且遗传因素似乎影响决策途径而非行为的表达。发现有三个基因位点在这两种试验中都影响饲养行为。然而,在这两种环境背景下,其他基因位点对行为有更大的影响。我们的结果表明,环境背景对决策的影响因行为类别而异。