Durbin C Emily, Klein Daniel N
Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 Feb;115(1):75-84. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.1.75.
One of the core propositions in most clinical and descriptive models of personality disorders (PDs) is that these conditions are stable over time. However, the available empirical literature suggests that PDs are far less stable than these models imply. The present study examines the 10-year stability of PDs in a sample of depressed outpatients who were assessed for the full range of Axis II conditions across 5 assessments. Three primary issues are addressed: (a) the stability of categorical PD diagnoses, (b) the relative stability of dimensional PD traits, and (c) the absolute stability of PD traits. The stability of PD diagnoses was poor to fair, and the stability of dimensional PD traits was fair to moderate. Growth curve analyses revealed complex patterns of change in absolute scores for PD traits across the 10-year interval. Stability of PDs was generally comparable to that of anxiety disorder diagnoses and normal personality traits.
大多数人格障碍(PDs)临床和描述模型的核心命题之一是,这些状况随时间推移是稳定的。然而,现有的实证文献表明,人格障碍的稳定性远低于这些模型所暗示的。本研究在一组抑郁症门诊患者样本中考察了人格障碍的10年稳定性,这些患者在5次评估中接受了针对全部轴II状况的评估。研究探讨了三个主要问题:(a)分类人格障碍诊断的稳定性,(b)维度人格障碍特质的相对稳定性,以及(c)人格障碍特质的绝对稳定性。人格障碍诊断的稳定性为差到一般,维度人格障碍特质的稳定性为一般到中等。生长曲线分析揭示了10年间人格障碍特质绝对分数变化的复杂模式。人格障碍的稳定性总体上与焦虑症诊断和正常人格特质的稳定性相当。