Suppr超能文献

人格障碍与物质使用障碍的持续性:对已发表的国家酒精与相关状况流行病学调查(NESARC)结果的重新分析

Personality disorders and the persistence of substance use disorders: A reanalysis of published NESARC findings.

作者信息

Vergés Alvaro, Jackson Kristina M, Bucholz Kathleen K, Trull Timothy J, Lane Sean P, Sher Kenneth J

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences.

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.

出版信息

J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Nov;123(4):809-20. doi: 10.1037/abn0000011. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine whether published findings regarding the association of personality disorders (PDs) with the persistence of substance use disorders (SUDs) are attributable to an artifact due to time of assessment of the PD. Two previous studies analyzed data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and found that Antisocial PD, Schizotypal PD, and Borderline PD are unique predictors of SUDs. However, a design limitation in NESARC (assessment of PDs at different waves) can potentially compromise these findings. To assess the influence of time of assessment of PDs and to identify associations that might be robust to time of assessment, we compared the association of PDs with 2 estimates of SUD persistence that were based on different populations at risk: (a) among those who were diagnosed with SUD at baseline, the proportion who continued to meet full criteria at follow-up ("prediction"); and (b) among those who were diagnosed with SUD at follow-up, the proportion who met full criteria at baseline ("postdiction"). Differences between prediction and postdiction revealed a robust pattern of higher odds ratios for postdiction among PDs assessed at baseline, and lower odds ratios for postdiction among PDs assessed at follow-up. All published significant associations between PDs and persistence of SUDs became nonsignificant in the postdiction analyses, with the exception of obsessive-compulsive PD predicting nicotine dependence persistence. The present results raise serious doubts about the validity of published findings on PDs and SUD persistence from the NESARC. Design limitations in NESARC preclude a direct comparison among PDs measured at different waves.

摘要

本研究的目的是检验已发表的关于人格障碍(PDs)与物质使用障碍(SUDs)持续性之间关联的研究结果,是否归因于PD评估时间所导致的假象。之前的两项研究分析了全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查(NESARC)的数据,发现反社会型人格障碍、分裂型人格障碍和边缘型人格障碍是SUDs的独特预测因素。然而,NESARC的一个设计局限(在不同波次评估PDs)可能会影响这些研究结果。为了评估PD评估时间的影响,并确定可能不受评估时间影响的关联,我们比较了PDs与基于不同风险人群的SUD持续性的两种估计值之间的关联:(a)在基线时被诊断为SUD的人群中,随访时仍符合全部标准的比例(“预测”);(b)在随访时被诊断为SUD的人群中,基线时符合全部标准的比例(“回溯预测”)。预测与回溯预测之间的差异显示出一种稳健的模式,即基线时评估的PDs中,回溯预测的优势比更高;随访时评估的PDs中,回溯预测的优势比更低。在回溯预测分析中,除了强迫型人格障碍预测尼古丁依赖持续性外,所有已发表的PDs与SUDs持续性之间的显著关联均不再显著。本研究结果对NESARC发表的关于PDs和SUDs持续性的研究结果的有效性提出了严重质疑。NESARC的设计局限使得无法对不同波次测量的PDs进行直接比较。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验