• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prevalence and 10-Year Stability of Personality Disorders From Adolescence to Young Adulthood in a High-Risk Sample.高风险样本中从青少年到青年期人格障碍的患病率及10年稳定性
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 24;13:840678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840678. eCollection 2022.
2
The stability of personality disorders and personality disorder criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人格障碍及其诊断标准的稳定性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Jun;102:102284. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102284. Epub 2023 Apr 23.
3
Two-year stability of personality disorder in older adolescent outpatients.青少年门诊患者人格障碍的两年稳定性
J Pers Disord. 2004 Dec;18(6):526-41. doi: 10.1521/pedi.18.6.526.54798.
4
Screening cluster A and cluster B personality disorders in Chinese high school students.筛查中国高中生的 A 群和 B 群人格障碍。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Apr 17;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-116.
5
Cross-system concordance of personality disorder diagnoses of DSM-IV and diagnostic criteria for research of ICD-10.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)人格障碍诊断与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)研究用诊断标准的跨系统一致性
J Pers Disord. 2002 Jun;16(3):283-92. doi: 10.1521/pedi.16.3.283.22537.
6
Do DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and Section III personality trait domains reflect the same genetic and environmental risk factors?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版第二部分的人格障碍和第三部分的人格特质领域是否反映相同的遗传和环境风险因素?
Psychol Med. 2017 Sep;47(12):2205-2215. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000824. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
7
[Personality disorders in a nonclinical sample of adolescents].[青少年非临床样本中的人格障碍]
Encephale. 2002 Nov-Dec;28(6 Pt 1):520-4.
8
Personality disorders are important risk factors for disability pensioning.人格障碍是领取残疾抚恤金的重要风险因素。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;49(12):2003-11. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0878-0. Epub 2014 May 3.
9
[The classification of personality disorders in ICD-11].[《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍分类]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2021 Nov;49(6):480-485. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000747. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
10
The hybrid model for the classification of personality disorders in DSM-5: a critical analysis.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中人格障碍分类的混合模型:批判性分析
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015 Sep;43(5):177-86. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term stability of self-reported psychopathic traits in former at-risk adolescents in youth welfare and juvenile justice institutions.青少年福利机构和少年司法机构中曾处于风险中的青少年自我报告的精神病态特征的长期稳定性。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Jul 16;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00938-w.
2
Childhood trauma is linked to epigenetic age deceleration in young adults with previous youth residential care placements.童年创伤与有过青少年院舍居住经历的年轻成年人的表观遗传年龄减速有关。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2379144. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2379144. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.ICD-11 人格障碍分类的实际影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05640-3.
4
Interplay between stress, sleep, and BDNF in a high-risk sample of young adults.压力、睡眠与脑源性神经营养因子在青年高危人群中的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 22;13(1):20524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47726-0.
5
Personality Disorders and Attachment Trauma in Adolescent Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.青少年精神障碍患者的人格障碍和依恋创伤。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Mar;52(3):457-471. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01141-1. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
6
Impaired Personality Functioning in Children and Adolescents Assessed with the in Parent-Report and Convergence with Maladaptive Personality Traits and Personality Structure in School and Clinic Samples.父母报告中评估的儿童和青少年人格功能受损以及与学校和临床样本中适应不良人格特质和人格结构的趋同情况
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;10(7):1186. doi: 10.3390/children10071186.
7
Key insights from studies on the stability of personality disorders in different age groups.关于不同年龄组人格障碍稳定性研究的关键见解。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 15;14:1109336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1109336. eCollection 2023.
8
The diagnosis that should speak its name: why it is ethically right to diagnose and treat personality disorder during adolescence.应直呼其名的诊断:为何在青少年期诊断和治疗人格障碍在伦理上是正确的。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 9;14:1130417. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1130417. eCollection 2023.
9
Personality functioning and the pathogenic effect of childhood maltreatment in a high-risk sample.高危样本中的人格功能及童年期虐待的致病作用
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Nov 30;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00527-1.
10
Adverse and traumatic exposures, posttraumatic stress disorder, telomere length, and hair cortisol - Exploring associations in a high-risk sample of young adult residential care leavers.不良和创伤性暴露、创伤后应激障碍、端粒长度与头发皮质醇——在离开寄宿照料机构的高危年轻成人样本中探索关联
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022 Sep 30;26:100524. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100524. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Editorial: Dimensional assessment of personality disorders in young people: A closer look on personality functioning in younger ages, different cultures, and various clinical settings.社论:青少年人格障碍的维度评估:深入探讨不同年龄、不同文化和各种临床环境下的人格功能
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 22;13:1082189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1082189. eCollection 2022.
2
The development of the rank-order stability of the Big Five across the life span.大五人格在整个生命周期中的等级稳定性的发展。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 May;122(5):920-941. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000398.
3
Mental disorders among adults formerly in out-of-home care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.成年人中曾接受过机构照料的人群的精神障碍:纵向研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;31(12):1963-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01828-0. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
Assessment of Criterion A.准则 A 的评估。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Feb;37:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Childhood adversity and borderline personality disorder: a meta-analysis.儿童逆境与边缘型人格障碍:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):6-20. doi: 10.1111/acps.13118. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
6
Clinical utility of categorical and dimensional perspectives on personality pathology: A meta-analytic review.人格病理学的类别和维度观点的临床实用性:元分析综述。
Personal Disord. 2019 Nov;10(6):479-490. doi: 10.1037/per0000365. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Clinical validity and intrarater and test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 - Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV).DSM-5 临床定式访谈 - 临床版(SCID-5-CV)的临床有效性以及评定者内信度和重测信度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;73(12):754-760. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12931. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
9
Borderline Symptoms at Age 12 Signal Risk for Poor Outcomes During the Transition to Adulthood: Findings From a Genetically Sensitive Longitudinal Cohort Study.12 岁时的边缘症状预示着向成年期过渡期间不良结局的风险:一项基于遗传敏感性纵向队列研究的结果。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;59(10):1165-1177.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
A Life Span Perspective on Borderline Personality Disorder.从生命全程视角看边缘型人格障碍。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jun 4;21(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1040-1.

高风险样本中从青少年到青年期人格障碍的患病率及10年稳定性

Prevalence and 10-Year Stability of Personality Disorders From Adolescence to Young Adulthood in a High-Risk Sample.

作者信息

d'Huart Delfine, Steppan Martin, Seker Süheyla, Bürgin David, Boonmann Cyril, Birkhölzer Marc, Jenkel Nils, Fegert Jörg M, Schmid Marc, Schmeck Klaus

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Research, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Division of Developmental and Personality Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 24;13:840678. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840678. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.840678
PMID:35401274
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8987201/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the implementation of the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) in early 2022, there will be a radical change in the framework and process for diagnosing personality disorders (PDs), indicating a transition from the categorical to the dimensional model. Despite increasing evidence that PDs are not as stable as previously assumed, the long-term stability of PDs remains under major debate. The aim of the current paper was to investigate the categorical and dimensional mean-level and rank-order stability of PDs from adolescence into young adulthood in a high-risk sample.

METHODS

In total, 115 young adults with a history of residential child welfare and juvenile-justice placements in Switzerland were included in the current study. PDs were assessed at baseline and at a 10-year follow-up. On a categorical level, mean-level stability was assessed through the proportion of enduring cases from baseline to follow-up. Rank-order stability was assessed through Cohen's κ and tetrachoric correlation coefficients. On a dimensional level, the magnitude of change between the PD trait scores at baseline and at follow-up was measured by Cohen's . Rank-order stability was assessed through Spearman's ρ.

RESULTS

The prevalence rate for any PD was 20.0% at baseline and 30.4% at follow-up. The most frequently diagnosed disorders were antisocial, borderline, and obsessive-compulsive PDs, both at baseline and at follow-up. On a categorical level, the mean-level stability of any PD was only moderate, and the mean-level stability of specific PDs was low, except of schizoid PD. Likewise, the rank-order stability of any PD category was moderate, while ranging from low to high for individual PD diagnoses. On a dimensional level, scores increased significantly for most PDs, except for histrionic traits, which decreased significantly from baseline to follow-up. Effect sizes were generally low. The rank-order stability for dimensional scores ranged from low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate low to moderate stability of Pds and Pd traits from adolescence to adulthood, which supports the growing evidence that categorical diagnoses of Pds are quite unstable. This in turn, emphasizes the use of the upcoming ICD-11 that Acknowledgments Pds to be only "relatively" stable.

摘要

背景

随着《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD - 11)于2022年初实施,人格障碍(PDs)的诊断框架和流程将发生根本性变化,这表明从类别模型向维度模型的转变。尽管越来越多的证据表明人格障碍并不像之前假设的那样稳定,但人格障碍的长期稳定性仍存在重大争议。本文的目的是在一个高风险样本中研究从青少年到青年期人格障碍的类别和维度平均水平及等级顺序稳定性。

方法

本研究共纳入115名有瑞士儿童福利机构居住史和青少年司法安置史的年轻人。在基线和10年随访时对人格障碍进行评估。在类别层面,通过从基线到随访的持续病例比例评估平均水平稳定性。通过科恩κ系数和四分相关系数评估等级顺序稳定性。在维度层面,用科恩系数测量基线和随访时人格障碍特质分数之间的变化幅度。通过斯皮尔曼ρ系数评估等级顺序稳定性。

结果

基线时任何人格障碍的患病率为20.0%,随访时为30.4%。在基线和随访时,最常诊断的障碍是反社会型、边缘型和强迫型人格障碍。在类别层面,任何人格障碍的平均水平稳定性仅为中等,特定人格障碍的平均水平稳定性较低,除了分裂样人格障碍。同样,任何人格障碍类别的等级顺序稳定性为中等,而个体人格障碍诊断的等级顺序稳定性从低到高不等。在维度层面,除了表演型特质从基线到随访显著下降外,大多数人格障碍的分数显著增加。效应大小一般较低。维度分数的等级顺序稳定性从低到中等。

结论

研究结果表明从青少年到成年期人格障碍及其特质的稳定性为低到中等,这支持了越来越多的证据表明人格障碍的类别诊断相当不稳定。这反过来强调了即将使用的ICD - 11,它承认人格障碍只是“相对”稳定。