McLaughlin R, Malkova D, Nimmo M A
Department of Applied Physiology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;60(9):1055-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602417. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
This study examines the impact of a short-term exercise programme, prescribed on the basis of current exercise recommendations, on energy balance in males and females to assess whether this type of exercise induces compensatory changes in spontaneous activity energy expenditure (SAEE) and energy intake (EI).
Individuals were monitored for 16 days, 8 days of habitual physical activity (C) and 8 days when exercise was imposed (E). Total energy expenditure (TEE) was calculated from individual relationships of VO2 and VCO2 to heart rate (HR) records of HR and physical activity obtained during waking hours of the C and E periods and basal metabolic rate (BMR) measurements (Deltatrac System, Datex Instrumentation). Changes in nude body mass (BM) were estimated by using a digital scale (Sartorius AG, Gottigen, Germany).
Laboratory and free-living.
Eight lean females (body fat: 17.5+/-4.5%) and eight males of similar percentage body fat participated in this study. All subjects were Caucasian and aged between 20 and 25 years.
During the E period, a supervised exercise session was conducted every second day, each consisting of a total net energy expenditure of 2092 kJ+BMR at 90% lactate threshold.
During the E period, TEE was higher than C in males and females (exercise: 95.2+/-13.9, 78.3+/-15.9 MJ; control: 82.4+/-10.4, 68.8+/-16.7 MJ, respectively; P<0.00; P=0.02). SAEE, calculated as TEE minus the energy expended during exercise, was not significantly different between C (males: 82.4+/-4.8 MJ; females: 68.8+/-7.6 MJ) and E (males: 86.8+/-6.3 MJ; females: 70.0+/-7.2 MJ) periods in either gender. Males showed no change in BM over the C (pre-intervention: 83.4+/-7.2 kg; post-intervention: 83.1+/-6.8 kg) or E (pre-intervention: 83.4+/-6.8 kg; post-intervention: 83.4+/-6.8 kg) periods. Females' BM over the C period did not alter (pre-intervention: 63.3+/-2.8 kg; post-intervention 63.7+/-3.1 kg); however, there was a significant decrease (P<0.00) in BM over the E period (pre-intervention: 63.0+/-2.7 kg; post-intervention: 62.4+/-2.7 kg).
The exercise programme was achieved in males and females without any impact on SAEE. Therefore, differences between genders in relation to BM reduction can be explained by differences in the EI response to exercise.
本研究基于当前的运动建议,考察一项短期运动计划对男性和女性能量平衡的影响,以评估这类运动是否会引起自发活动能量消耗(SAEE)和能量摄入(EI)的代偿性变化。
对个体进行16天的监测,其中8天为习惯性身体活动(C期),8天为施加运动干预的时期(E期)。总能量消耗(TEE)根据C期和E期清醒时间内VO2和VCO2与心率(HR)的个体关系以及HR和身体活动记录以及基础代谢率(BMR)测量值(Deltatrac系统,Datex仪器公司)来计算。使用数字秤(赛多利斯公司,德国哥廷根)估算裸体重(BM)的变化。
实验室和自由生活环境。
八名瘦女性(体脂:17.5±4.5%)和八名体脂百分比相似的男性参与了本研究。所有受试者均为白种人,年龄在20至25岁之间。
在E期,每隔一天进行一次有监督的运动课程,每次课程的总净能量消耗为2092千焦+BMR,运动强度为乳酸阈值的90%。
在E期,男性和女性的TEE均高于C期(运动组:分别为95.2±13.9、78.3±15.9兆焦;对照组:分别为82.4±10.4、68.8±16.7兆焦;P<0.00;P=0.02)。以TEE减去运动期间消耗的能量计算得出的SAEE,在C期(男性:82.4±4.8兆焦;女性:68.8±7.6兆焦)和E期(男性:86.8±6.3兆焦;女性:70.0±7.2兆焦)的任何性别中均无显著差异。男性在C期(干预前:83.4±7.2千克;干预后:83.1±6.8千克)或E期(干预前:83.4±6.8千克;干预后:83.4±6.8千克)的BM没有变化。女性在C期的BM没有改变(干预前:63.3±2.8千克;干预后63.7±3.1千克);然而,在E期BM有显著下降(P<0.00)(干预前:63.0±2.7千克;干预后:62.4±2.7千克)。
男性和女性均完成了运动计划,且对SAEE没有任何影响。因此,性别在BM降低方面的差异可以通过EI对运动的反应差异来解释。