Moyle Leonie C, Graham Elaine B
Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 May;23(5):973-80. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj112. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
Marker transmission ratio distortion (TRD) in genetic mapping populations is frequently ascribed to selection against allelic combinations that cause hybrid incompatibility. Accordingly, genomic regions of TRD should be nonrandomly associated (colocated) with loci that underlie hybrid incompatibility. To directly test this hypothesis, we evaluated the genome-wide qualitative and quantitative agreement between chromosomal regions exhibiting marker TRD and those known to contain hybrid incompatibility quantitative trait locus (QTL). Incompatibility data came from a near-isogenic line (NIL) analysis of pollen and seed sterility in a cross between two Solanum (formerly Lycopersicon) species. We assessed (1) whether these incompatibility loci are colocated with markers that show significant TRD in two earlier generations preceding these introgression lines and (2) whether the magnitude of marker distortion quantitatively matches the estimated strength of selection against each incompatibility locus. We found evidence that TRD regions are chromosomally colocated with hybrid incompatibility loci more frequently than is expected by chance: pollen sterility QTLs were most closely associated with distorted heterozygote frequencies in later-generation backcrosses. Nonetheless, there was no evidence for an association between TRD and seed sterility and little evidence of a quantitative association between the magnitude of marker TRD and the fitness effects of heterospecific alleles at each chromosomal location. We propose and test a model (the "dance partner" model) to explain several cases where regions of TRD are not associated with hybrid incompatibility loci. Under this model, some NILs containing greater than one heterospecific introgression may not express hybrid incompatibility phenotypes because they carry both appropriate genetic dance partners required for a fully functional interaction. Accordingly, negative interactions expressed in earlier backcross generations are masked in these double-introgression NILs. Based on this model, we identify the location of several new putative pairwise interactors underlying hybrid incompatibility in this species cross.
遗传作图群体中的标记传递比失真(TRD)通常归因于对导致杂种不亲和的等位基因组合的选择。因此,TRD的基因组区域应该与构成杂种不亲和的基因座非随机关联(共定位)。为了直接检验这一假设,我们评估了表现出标记TRD的染色体区域与已知包含杂种不亲和数量性状基因座(QTL)的区域之间在全基因组范围内的定性和定量一致性。不亲和数据来自对两个茄属(原番茄属)物种杂交中花粉和种子不育的近等基因系(NIL)分析。我们评估了:(1)这些不亲和基因座是否与在这些渗入系之前的两个早期世代中显示出显著TRD的标记共定位;(2)标记失真的程度是否在数量上与针对每个不亲和基因座的选择强度估计值相匹配。我们发现有证据表明,TRD区域在染色体上与杂种不亲和基因座共定位的频率高于偶然预期:花粉不育QTL与后代回交中扭曲的杂合子频率关联最为紧密。尽管如此,没有证据表明TRD与种子不育之间存在关联,也几乎没有证据表明标记TRD的程度与每个染色体位置上异种特异性等位基因的适合度效应之间存在定量关联。我们提出并检验了一个模型(“舞伴”模型)来解释TRD区域与杂种不亲和基因座不相关的几种情况。在这个模型中,一些包含不止一个异种特异性渗入的NIL可能不会表现出杂种不亲和表型,因为它们携带了进行完全功能性相互作用所需的两个合适的遗传舞伴。因此,在早期回交世代中表达的负面相互作用在这些双重渗入NIL中被掩盖了。基于这个模型,我们确定了该物种杂交中几个新的潜在成对相互作用因子的位置,这些因子是杂种不亲和的基础。