• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

戒烟研究中对戒断曲线解读的错误。

Errors in interpreting abstinence curves in studies of smoking cessation.

作者信息

Hughes John R, Callas Peter W

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Feb;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1080/14622200500431635.

DOI:10.1080/14622200500431635
PMID:16497595
Abstract

Articles on smoking cessation often present curves representing the percentage of smokers still abstinent over time. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how common conclusions from inspecting these curves may be misleading because they are based on assumptions of which readers are not aware. For example, when active and control abstinence curves converge, this is often interpreted to indicate a diminution of treatment effect size over time. We use illustrative data to show that this interpretation is correct if one assumes a treatment has a constant additive effect; however, if one assumes treatment has a constant multiplicative effect, then converging curves can still indicate a constant treatment effect. Converging abstinence curves are also often interpreted to indicate that the rate of relapse is greater in the active than the control group. We illustrate that this interpretation is correct if one is interested in cumulative relapse rate and uses all subjects in the denominator; however, if one is interested in relapse over a discrete subperiod of time (e.g., immediately after treatment stops), and thus uses only those at risk for relapse, then converging curves can still indicate a constant relapse rate. When trials interpret abstinence curves, they should make clear whether they are assuming additive or multiplicative effects of treatment and are discussing overall or local relapse rates. They should also report both additive and multiplicative effect sizes.

摘要

关于戒烟的文章常常呈现出代表随着时间推移仍保持戒烟状态的吸烟者百分比的曲线。本文的目的是说明,通过审视这些曲线得出的常见结论可能具有误导性,因为它们基于读者未意识到的假设。例如,当主动戒烟组和对照组的戒烟曲线趋于一致时,这通常被解释为表明治疗效果大小随时间减小。我们用示例数据表明,如果假设治疗具有恒定的相加效应,那么这种解释是正确的;然而,如果假设治疗具有恒定的相乘效应,那么曲线趋同仍可表明治疗效果恒定。趋同的戒烟曲线也常常被解释为表明主动戒烟组的复发率高于对照组。我们说明,如果关注累积复发率并将所有受试者作为分母,那么这种解释是正确的;然而,如果关注在一个离散的子时间段(例如,治疗刚结束后)内的复发情况,从而仅将有复发风险的人作为分母,那么曲线趋同仍可表明复发率恒定。当试验解读戒烟曲线时,应明确他们是假设治疗的相加效应还是相乘效应,以及讨论的是总体复发率还是局部复发率。他们还应报告相加效应大小和相乘效应大小。

相似文献

1
Errors in interpreting abstinence curves in studies of smoking cessation.戒烟研究中对戒断曲线解读的错误。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Feb;8(1):7-12. doi: 10.1080/14622200500431635.
2
Late relapse/sustained abstinence among former smokers: a longitudinal study.既往吸烟者的晚期复发/持续戒烟:一项纵向研究。
Prev Med. 2004 Dec;39(6):1156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.028.
3
Social class, education, and smoking cessation: Long-term follow-up of patients treated at a smoking cessation unit.社会阶层、教育程度与戒烟:戒烟门诊患者的长期随访
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Feb;8(1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/14622200500264432.
4
A randomized controlled clinical trial of bupropion SR and individual smoking cessation counseling.安非他酮缓释片与个体化戒烟咨询的随机对照临床试验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Apr;10(4):717-29. doi: 10.1080/14622200801968343.
5
The effect of proactively identifying smokers and offering smoking cessation support in primary care populations: a cluster-randomized trial.在基层医疗人群中主动识别吸烟者并提供戒烟支持的效果:一项整群随机试验。
Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):998-1006; discussion 1007-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02206.x. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
6
A 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bupropion sr added to high-dose dual nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation or reduction in schizophrenia.一项为期12周的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,该研究将安非他酮缓释剂添加至高剂量双重尼古丁替代疗法中,用于精神分裂症患者戒烟或减少吸烟量。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Aug;27(4):380-6. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0b013e3180ca86fa.
7
Implications of nonresponse patterns in the analysis of smoking cessation trials.戒烟试验分析中无应答模式的影响
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 May;10(5):891-6. doi: 10.1080/14622200802027149.
8
A randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation therapy on sustained abstinence.一项评估报销戒烟治疗费用对持续戒烟效果影响的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2006 Nov;101(11):1656-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01578.x.
9
Effect of nicotine lozenges on affective smoking withdrawal symptoms: secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.尼古丁含片对情感性戒烟戒断症状的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验的二次分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1461-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.019.
10
Relapse prevention in a national smoking cessation contest: effects of coping planning.全国戒烟竞赛中的复发预防:应对规划的效果
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;13(Pt 3):525-35. doi: 10.1348/135910707X224504. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
US Nicotine Vaping Product Simulation Model: The Effect of Vaping and Tobacco Control Policies on Smoking Prevalence and Smoking-Attributable Deaths.美国尼古丁蒸气产品模拟模型:蒸气使用和烟草控制政策对吸烟流行率和与吸烟有关的死亡人数的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 3;18(9):4876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094876.
2
Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.戒烟药物在第一年的获益递减:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2018 May;113(5):805-816. doi: 10.1111/add.14134. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
3
The effect of five smoking cessation pharmacotherapies on smoking cessation milestones.
五种戒烟药物疗法对戒烟各阶段的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):34-42. doi: 10.1037/a0022154.
4
New methods for tobacco dependence treatment research.烟草依赖治疗研究的新方法。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Apr;41(2):192-207. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9252-y.
5
Do point prevalence and prolonged abstinence measures produce similar results in smoking cessation studies? A systematic review.点患病率和延长禁欲措施在戒烟研究中产生相似的结果吗?系统评价。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Jul;12(7):756-62. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq078. Epub 2010 May 26.