Plant Ewan P, Dinman Jonathan D
Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, Microbiology Building, Room 2135, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
RNA. 2006 Apr;12(4):666-73. doi: 10.1261/rna.2225206. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
Studies of programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting (-1 PRF) have been approached over the past two decades by many different laboratories using a diverse array of virus-derived frameshift signals in translational assay systems derived from a variety of sources. Though it is generally acknowledged that both absolute and relative -1 PRF efficiency can vary in an assay system-dependent manner, no methodical study of this phenomenon has been undertaken. To address this issue, a series of slippery site mutants of the SARS-associated coronavirus frameshift signal were systematically assayed in four different eukaryotic translational systems. HIV-1 promoted frameshifting was also compared between Escherichia coli and a human T-cell line expression systems. The results of these analyses highlight different aspects of each system, suggesting in general that (1) differences can be due to the assay systems themselves; (2) phylogenetic differences in ribosome structure can affect frameshifting efficiency; and (3) care must be taken to employ the closest phylogenetic match between a specific -1 PRF signal and the choice of translational assay system.
在过去二十年里,许多不同的实验室采用来自多种来源的翻译分析系统,利用各种各样源自病毒的移码信号,对程序性-1核糖体移码(-1 PRF)进行了研究。尽管人们普遍认为,绝对和相对-1 PRF效率会因分析系统的不同而有所变化,但尚未对这一现象进行系统的研究。为了解决这个问题,我们在四种不同的真核翻译系统中,对严重急性呼吸综合征相关冠状病毒移码信号的一系列滑码位点突变体进行了系统分析。还比较了大肠杆菌和人T细胞系表达系统中HIV-1促进的移码情况。这些分析结果突出了每个系统的不同方面,总体表明:(1)差异可能归因于分析系统本身;(2)核糖体结构的系统发育差异会影响移码效率;(3)必须注意在特定的-1 PRF信号与翻译分析系统的选择之间采用最接近的系统发育匹配。