Siewert Bettina, Tye Grace, Kruskal Jonathan, Sosna Jacob, Opelka Frank, Raptopoulos Vassilios, Goldberg S Nahum
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02115, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar;186(3):680-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1708.
Our objective was to determine whether abscess size can be used as a discriminating factor to guide management of patients with diverticular abscesses.
We performed a word search of our CT database between July 2001 and July 2002 for the CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. CTs were retrospectively reviewed as consensus opinion of two reviewers. CTs were evaluated for presence of an abscess, its location, maximum diameter, and feasibility of percutaneous abscess drainage. Abscesses were categorized into smaller than 3 cm and larger than or equal to 3 cm, and the management of these groups was compared.
Thirty-one abscesses were noted in 30 (17%) of 181 patients with a CT diagnosis of diverticulitis. Twenty-two (73%) of 30 patients had 23 abscesses, all of which were smaller than 3 cm and were treated and resolved with antibiotics alone (p < 0.001). Eight (36%) of 22 required surgical treatment. Eight (26%) of 31 abscesses had a maximum diameter larger than or equal to 3 cm. Four (50%) of eight patients with abscesses 3.4-4.1 cm were treated with antibiotics alone. Four (50%) of eight abscesses, all larger than 4.1 cm, were treated with CT-guided drainage and one abscess required repeat drainage. After resolution of symptoms, surgery was performed in five (62.5%) of eight of the larger abscesses.
Patients with abscesses smaller than 3 cm in size can be treated with antibiotics alone and, in some cases, as outpatients, and may not uniformly require surgery. This is also likely true for patients with abscesses 3-4 cm in size, although our results in this group were limited by a small sample size. Patients with abscesses larger than or equal to 4 cm can be managed with CT-guided abscess drainage followed by referral for surgical treatment.
我们的目的是确定脓肿大小是否可作为一个鉴别因素,以指导憩室脓肿患者的治疗。
我们在2001年7月至2002年7月期间对我们的CT数据库进行了检索,以查找憩室炎的CT诊断结果。CT扫描由两位阅片者通过回顾性分析达成共识意见。对CT扫描结果进行评估,以确定是否存在脓肿、脓肿位置、最大直径以及经皮脓肿引流的可行性。脓肿被分为小于3厘米和大于或等于3厘米两组,并对这两组的治疗情况进行比较。
在181例CT诊断为憩室炎的患者中,30例(17%)发现了31个脓肿。30例患者中有22例(73%)有23个脓肿,所有这些脓肿均小于3厘米,仅用抗生素治疗后痊愈(p < 0.001)。22例中有8例(36%)需要手术治疗。31个脓肿中有8个(26%)最大直径大于或等于3厘米。8例脓肿大小在3.4 - 4.1厘米的患者中有4例(50%)仅用抗生素治疗。8个脓肿中,所有大于4.1厘米的4个(50%)采用CT引导下引流治疗,1个脓肿需要重复引流。症状缓解后,8个较大脓肿中有5例(62.5%)接受了手术。
脓肿小于3厘米的患者可仅用抗生素治疗,在某些情况下可作为门诊患者治疗,可能并非都需要手术。对于脓肿大小在3 - 4厘米的患者可能也是如此,尽管我们在这组患者中的结果因样本量小而受到限制。脓肿大于或等于4厘米的患者可采用CT引导下脓肿引流,随后转诊接受手术治疗。