Reuter Peter
School of Public Policy, University of Maryland and the RAND Corporation, MD, USA.
Addiction. 2006 Mar;101(3):315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01336.x.
Many nations now spend large sums of government money to reduce drug problems. The size and composition of public expenditures aimed at reducing drug use and related problems (a drug budget) is a useful partial description of a nation's drug policy. This paper examines whether it is possible to estimate these sums in a consistent manner across nations.
Past drug budget efforts in the United Kingdom and United States were reviewed. A new methodology was offered for estimation and used for estimates of expenditures in the Netherlands and Sweden. Using this methodology, expenditures were compared.
In both the Netherlands and Sweden, with very different official drug policy rhetoric, enforcement expenditures dominate the total; prevention expenditures are a tiny share. The baseline estimates indicate that the Netherlands, by a variety of metrics (e.g. Euros per capita, Euros per problematic user), spends more on drug control, even enforcement, than Sweden but the range of estimates is such that this cannot be inferred with confidence.
Estimating total government expenditures on reducing drug use and related problems is feasible and can yield useful policy insights.
现在许多国家花费大量政府资金来减少毒品问题。旨在减少毒品使用及相关问题的公共支出规模和构成(毒品预算)是对一个国家毒品政策的一种有用的部分描述。本文探讨是否有可能以一致的方式对各国的这些资金进行估算。
回顾了英国和美国过去的毒品预算情况。提出了一种新的估算方法,并用于估算荷兰和瑞典的支出。使用该方法对支出进行了比较。
在荷兰和瑞典,尽管官方毒品政策措辞截然不同,但执法支出在总支出中占主导地位;预防支出所占份额极小。基线估计表明,按各种指标(如人均欧元、每个问题使用者的欧元数)计算,荷兰在毒品管制甚至执法方面的支出比瑞典更多,但估计范围使得无法确定地推断出这一点。
估算政府用于减少毒品使用及相关问题的总支出是可行的,并且可以产生有用的政策见解。