比较各国的酒精政策：科学还是荒谬？
Comparing alcohol policies between countries: science or silliness?
作者信息
Ritter Alison
机构信息
Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040153.
Abstract
Alison Ritter discusses the pros and cons of a new metric, called the Alcohol Policy Index, which is designed to allow comparisons between countries of their alcohol policies.
摘要
艾莉森·里特讨论了一种名为“酒精政策指数”的新指标的利弊，该指标旨在使各国之间能够对其酒精政策进行比较。
相似文献
1
Comparing alcohol policies between countries: science or silliness?比较各国的酒精政策：科学还是荒谬？
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040153.
2
A Commentary on the Limits of Alcoholic Beverage Policies.关于酒精饮料政策局限性的评论
Alcohol Alcohol. 2017 Nov 1;52(6):706-714. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx048.
3
Assessing restrictiveness of national alcohol marketing policies.评估国家酒精营销政策的限制性。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):557-62. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agu033. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
4
Alcohol industry and alcohol policy--the challenge ahead.酒精行业与酒精政策——未来的挑战。
Addiction. 2009 Feb;104 Suppl 1:3-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02429.x.
5
Russian alcohol policy in the making.俄罗斯正在制定的酒精政策。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2007 Sep-Oct;42(5):500-5. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agm040. Epub 2007 May 30.
6
[Alcohol and adolescents: study to implement municipal policies].[酒精与青少年：实施城市政策的研究]
Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Jun;41(3):396-403.
7
Alcohol control policies and drinking patterns: an international game of politics against science.酒精控制政策与饮酒模式：一场反对科学的国际政治博弈。
J Subst Abuse. 1988;1(1):109-15; discussion 117-23. doi: 10.1016/s0899-3289(88)80013-0.
8
An alcohol strategy for England: the good, the bad and the ugly.英格兰的酒精战略：利弊与丑态
Alcohol Alcohol. 2004 Sep-Oct;39(5):377-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh087.
9
For public health doctors, alcohol is the new tobacco.对于公共卫生医生来说，酒精成了新的烟草。
N Z Med J. 2009 Sep 25;122(1303):9.
10
Nigeria: alcohol and society today.尼日利亚：当今的酒精与社会
Addiction. 2007 Apr;102(4):519-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01619.x.
引用本文的文献
1
The Cannabis Policy Scale: A New Research and Surveillance Tool for U.S. States.《大麻政策量表：美国各州的一项新研究和监测工具》。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Nov;83(6):829-838. doi: 10.15288/jsad.21-00462.
2
Alcohol Policies in U.S. States, 1999-2018.美国各州 1999-2018 年的酒精政策。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jan;81(1):58-67. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.58.
3
Development of the International Alcohol Policy and Injury Index.国际酒精政策与伤害指数的制定。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.6.
4
Alcohol policies and impaired driving in the United States: Effects of driving- vs. drinking-oriented policies.美国的酒精政策与酒驾：以驾驶为导向和以饮酒为导向的政策的影响。
Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2015;4(2):119-130. doi: 10.7895/ijadr.v4i2.205.
5
Youth Drinking in the United States: Relationships With Alcohol Policies and Adult Drinking.美国青少年饮酒：与酒精政策及成人饮酒的关系
Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):18-27. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0537. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
6
Developing an alcohol policy assessment toolkit: application in the western Pacific.开发酒精政策评估工具包：在西太平洋地区的应用
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Oct 1;92(10):726-33. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.130708. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
7
Public spending for illegal drug and alcohol treatment in hospitals: an EU cross-country comparison.医院用于非法药物和酒精治疗的公共支出：一项欧盟国家间的比较。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2014 Jun 30;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-9-26.
8
A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.美国酒精政策环境新量表及其与狂饮的关系。
Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.015.
9
Efficacy and the strength of evidence of U.S. alcohol control policies.美国酒精控制政策的效果和证据强度。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jul;45(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.03.008.
10
Alcohol control policies and alcohol consumption by youth: a multi-national study.酒精控制政策与青少年饮酒：一项跨国研究。
Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1849-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02698.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries.30个国家酒精控制政策的比较分析。
PLoS Med. 2007 Apr;4(4):e151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040151.
2
Comparative cost-effectiveness of policy instruments for reducing the global burden of alcohol, tobacco and illicit drug use.降低全球酒精、烟草和非法药物使用负担的政策工具的成本效益比较
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Nov;25(6):553-65. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944487.
3
Global burden of disease from alcohol, illicit drugs and tobacco.酒精、非法药物和烟草造成的全球疾病负担。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2006 Nov;25(6):503-13. doi: 10.1080/09595230600944453.
4
How cost-of-illness studies can be made more useful for illicit drug policy analysis.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(2):75-85. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605020-00002.
5
What drug policies cost: estimating drug policy expenditures in Sweden, 2002: work in progress.
Addiction. 2006 Mar;101(3):330-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01344.x.
6
What drug policies cost: estimating government drug policy expenditures.毒品政策的成本：估算政府毒品政策支出
Addiction. 2006 Mar;101(3):315-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01336.x.
Zotero 插件