• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于前列腺癌筛查知识的测试。南加州医生的在线试点评估。

A test of knowledge about prostate cancer screening. Online pilot evaluation among Southern California Physicians.

作者信息

Bell Douglas S, Hays Ron D, Hoffman Jerome R, Day Frank C, Higa Jerilyn K, Wilkes Michael S

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Apr;21(4):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00337.x. Epub 2006 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00337.x
PMID:16499545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1484731/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the benefits of prostate cancer screening are uncertain and guidelines recommend that physicians share the screening decision with their patients, most U.S. men over age 50 are routinely screened, often without counseling.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an instrument for assessing physicians' knowledge related to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on prostate cancer screening.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy internists, family physicians, and general practitioners in the Los Angeles area who deliver primary care to adult men.

MEASUREMENTS

We assessed knowledge related to prostate cancer screening (natural history, test characteristics, treatment effects, and guideline recommendations), beliefs about the net benefits of screening, and prostate cancer screening practices for men in different age groups, using an online survey. We constructed a knowledge scale having 15 multiple-choice items.

RESULTS

Participants' mean knowledge score was 7.4 (range 3 to 12) of 15 (Cronbach's alpha=0.71). Higher knowledge scores were associated with less belief in a mortality benefit from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing (r=-.49, P<.001). Participants could be categorized as low, age-selective, and high users of routine PSA screening. High users had lower knowledge scores than age-selective or low users, and they believed much more in mortality benefits from PSA screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its internal consistency and its correlations with measures of physicians' net beliefs and self-reported practices, the knowledge scale developed in this study holds promise for measuring the effects of professional education on prostate cancer screening. The scale deserves further evaluation in broader populations.

摘要

背景

尽管前列腺癌筛查的益处尚不明确,且指南建议医生与患者共同做出筛查决策,但大多数50岁以上的美国男性仍接受常规筛查,且往往未接受咨询。

目的

开发一种工具,用于评估医生对美国预防服务工作组关于前列腺癌筛查建议的知识掌握情况。

参与者

洛杉矶地区70名向成年男性提供初级保健服务的内科医生、家庭医生和全科医生。

测量方法

我们通过在线调查评估了与前列腺癌筛查相关的知识(自然史、检测特征、治疗效果和指南建议)、对筛查净效益的看法以及不同年龄组男性的前列腺癌筛查实践。我们构建了一个包含15个多项选择题的知识量表。

结果

参与者在15分的量表上平均知识得分为7.4分(范围为3至12分,克朗巴哈系数=0.71)。知识得分越高,对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测带来的死亡率益处的信念就越低(r = -0.49,P < 0.001)。参与者可分为常规PSA筛查的低使用者、年龄选择性使用者和高使用者。高使用者的知识得分低于年龄选择性使用者或低使用者,且他们更坚信PSA筛查能带来死亡率益处。

结论

基于其内部一致性以及与医生净信念和自我报告实践测量指标的相关性,本研究开发的知识量表有望用于衡量专业教育对前列腺癌筛查的影响。该量表值得在更广泛的人群中进行进一步评估。

相似文献

1
A test of knowledge about prostate cancer screening. Online pilot evaluation among Southern California Physicians.一项关于前列腺癌筛查知识的测试。南加州医生的在线试点评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Apr;21(4):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00337.x. Epub 2006 Feb 22.
2
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.大型综合医疗系统中的前列腺癌筛查实践:2007 - 2014年
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
3
Primary Care Physicians Beliefs about Prostate-Specific Antigen Evidence Uncertainty, Screening Efficacy, and Test Use.初级保健医生对前列腺特异性抗原证据不确定性、筛查效果和检测使用的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):491-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
[Prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen: The views of general and laboratory physicians].[使用前列腺特异性抗原进行前列腺癌筛查:普通医生和检验医生的观点]
Semergen. 2018 Sep;44(6):409-419. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Prostate-specific antigen screening: An update of physician beliefs and practices.前列腺特异性抗原筛查:医生观念和实践的更新。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 6.
6
Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey.基层医疗医生报告的前列腺癌筛查前筛查讨论的使用情况:一项横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Mar 18;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-19.
7
Do Swiss urologists and Swiss internists screen themselves and their relatives for prostate cancer? A questionnaire study.瑞士泌尿科医生和内科医生会对自己和亲属进行前列腺癌筛查吗?一项问卷调查研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2023 Sep 14;153:40115. doi: 10.57187/smw.2023.40115.
8
Factors influencing primary care physicians' decision to order prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for men without prostate cancer.影响初级保健医生决定为无前列腺癌男性开具前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的因素。
Acta Oncol. 2013 Nov;52(8):1602-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.762998. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
9
Prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening. Do physician characteristics affect its use?用于前列腺癌筛查的前列腺特异性抗原。医生的特征会影响其使用吗?
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Jul;17(1):87-90. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00041-0.
10
[Use of prostatic specific antigen in primary care (PSA)].[前列腺特异性抗原在基层医疗中的应用(PSA)]
Semergen. 2017 Apr;43(3):189-195. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigation-Based Telehealth Informed Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in Black Men.基于导航的远程医疗决策支持系统在黑人男性前列腺癌筛查中的应用
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 28;31(7):3698-3712. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31070273.
2
Delivering the unexpected-Information needs for PSA screening from Men's perspective: A qualitative study.从男性视角探讨前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查信息需求:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1403-1412. doi: 10.1111/hex.13275. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
3
The impact of educational sessions provided on prostate cancer, and its screening tests on the knowledge level, and participation behavior of the individuals in questionnaire surveys.关于前列腺癌的教育课程及其筛查测试对问卷调查中个体知识水平和参与行为的影响。
Turk J Urol. 2014 Mar;40(1):17-23. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.80688.
4
Doctors' approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study.基层医疗中医生对前列腺特异性抗原检测及过度诊断的处理方式:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e006367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006367.
5
[Are physicians in primary care aware of the lack of evidence for population-based screening for prostate cancer?].基层医疗医生是否意识到缺乏基于人群的前列腺癌筛查证据?
Aten Primaria. 2013 Feb;45(2):122-3. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
6
Physicians' attitudes about shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.医生对前列腺癌筛查共同决策的态度。
Fam Med. 2011 Apr;43(4):260-6.
7
A national survey of medical students' beliefs and knowledge in screening for prostate cancer.一项关于医学生对前列腺癌筛查的信念和知识的全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):80-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-006-0015-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological effects of a suspicious prostate cancer screening test followed by a benign biopsy result.可疑前列腺癌筛查结果随后活检结果为良性的心理影响。
Am J Med. 2004 Nov 15;117(10):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.036.
2
Do men know that they have had a prostate-specific antigen test? Accuracy of self-reports of testing at 2 sites.男性是否知道他们做过前列腺特异性抗原检测?两个地点检测自我报告的准确性。
Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1336-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1336.
3
Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care setting.初级保健提供者对管理式医疗环境中结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素的看法。
Cancer. 2004 May 1;100(9):1843-52. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20209.
4
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004.《美国癌症协会2004年癌症早期检测指南》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Jan-Feb;54(1):41-52. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.41.
5
Construct validity in psychological tests.心理测试中的结构效度。
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.
6
Why do primary care physicians in the United States and France order prostate-specific antigen tests for asymptomatic patients?为什么美国和法国的初级保健医生会为无症状患者开具前列腺特异性抗原检测?
Med Decis Making. 2003 Jul-Aug;23(4):301-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03256010.
7
Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence?在美国对男性进行前列腺癌和结直肠癌筛查:实际做法是否符合证据?
JAMA. 2003 Mar 19;289(11):1414-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1414.
8
United States life tables, 2000.《2000年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2002 Dec 19;51(3):1-38.
9
Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组证据更新
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):917-29. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00014.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: recommendation and rationale.前列腺癌筛查:建议及依据。
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):915-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00013.