• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络学习中自我评估问题和学习风格的影响:一项随机对照交叉试验。

Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in Web-based learning: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.

作者信息

Cook David A, Thompson Warren G, Thomas Kris G, Thomas Matthew R, Pankratz V Shane

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Baldwin 4-A, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):231-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00001888-200603000-00005
PMID:16501263
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of self-assessment questions on learners' knowledge and format preference in a Web-based course, and investigate associations between learning styles and outcomes.

METHOD

The authors conducted a randomized, controlled, crossover trial in the continuity clinics of the Mayo-Rochester internal medicine residency program during the 2003-04 academic year. Case-based self-assessment questions were added to Web-based modules covering topics in ambulatory internal medicine. Participants completed two modules with questions and two modules without questions, with sequence randomly assigned. Outcomes included knowledge assessed after each module, format preference, and learning style assessed using the Index of Learning Styles.

RESULTS

A total of 121 of 146 residents (83%) consented. Residents had higher test scores when using the question format (mean +/- standard error, 78.9% +/- 1.0) than when using the standard format (76.2% +/- 1.0, p = .006). Residents preferring the question format scored higher (79.7% +/- 1.1) than those preferring standard (69.5% +/- 2.3, p < .001). Learning styles did not affect scores except that visual-verbal "intermediate" learners (80.6% +/- 1.4) and visual learners (77.5% +/- 1.3) did better than verbal learners (70.9% +/- 3.0, p = .003 and p = .033, respectively). Sixty-five of 78 residents (83.3%, 95% CI 73.2-90.8%) preferred the question format. Learning styles were not associated with preference (p > .384). Although the question format took longer than the standard format (60.4 +/- 3.6 versus 44.3 +/- 3.3 minutes, p < .001), 55 of 77 residents (71.4%, 60.0-81.2%) reported that it was more efficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Instructional methods that actively engage learners improve learning outcomes. These findings hold implications for both Web-based learning and "traditional" educational activities. Future research, in both Web-based learning and other teaching modalities, should focus on further defining the effectiveness of selected instructional methods in specific learning contexts.

摘要

目的

确定自我评估问题对基于网络课程的学习者知识及格式偏好的影响,并研究学习风格与学习成果之间的关联。

方法

作者于2003 - 2004学年在梅奥 - 罗切斯特内科住院医师培训项目的连续性诊所中进行了一项随机、对照、交叉试验。基于病例的自我评估问题被添加到涵盖门诊内科主题的网络模块中。参与者完成两个带问题的模块和两个不带问题的模块,顺序随机分配。结果包括每个模块后评估的知识、格式偏好以及使用学习风格指数评估的学习风格。

结果

146名住院医师中有121名(83%)同意参与。住院医师使用问题格式时的测试成绩(均值±标准误,78.9%±1.0)高于使用标准格式时(76.2%±1.0,p = 0.006)。偏好问题格式的住院医师得分更高(79.7%±1.1),高于偏好标准格式的住院医师(69.5%±2.3,p < 0.001)。学习风格除了对视觉 - 语言“中间型”学习者(80.6%±1.4)和视觉型学习者(77.5%±1.3)的成绩优于语言型学习者(70.9%±3.0,分别为p = 0.003和p = 0.033)外,对成绩没有影响。78名住院医师中有65名(83.3%,95%可信区间73.2 - 90.8%)偏好问题格式。学习风格与偏好无关(p > 0.384)。虽然问题格式比标准格式花费的时间更长(60.4±3.6对44.3±3.3分钟,p < 0.001),但77名住院医师中有55名(71.4%,60.0 - 81.2%)报告说它更有效。

结论

积极让学习者参与的教学方法能提高学习成果。这些发现对基于网络的学习和“传统”教育活动都有启示。未来在基于网络的学习和其他教学模式方面的研究,应专注于进一步确定特定教学方法在特定学习情境中的有效性。

相似文献

1
Impact of self-assessment questions and learning styles in Web-based learning: a randomized, controlled, crossover trial.基于网络学习中自我评估问题和学习风格的影响:一项随机对照交叉试验。
Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):231-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00005.
2
Lack of interaction between sensing-intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: a randomized crossover trial.感知-直觉学习风格与问题优先和信息优先教学之间缺乏相互作用:一项随机交叉试验。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Mar;14(1):79-90. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9089-8. Epub 2007 Nov 24.
3
Web-based learning in residents' continuity clinics: a randomized, controlled trial.住院医师连续性门诊中的基于网络的学习:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Med. 2005 Jan;80(1):90-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00022.
4
Test-enhanced web-based learning: optimizing the number of questions (a randomized crossover trial).基于测试的增强型网络学习:优化问题数量(一项随机交叉试验)。
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):169-75. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000084.
5
Adapting web-based instruction to residents' knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial.使基于网络的教学适应住院医师的知识水平可提高学习效率:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):985-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0541-0.
6
Case-based or non-case-based questions for teaching postgraduate physicians: a randomized crossover trial.用于研究生医师教学的基于病例或非基于病例的问题:一项随机交叉试验。
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10):1419-25. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b6b36e.
7
Enhancing motivation with the "virtual" supervisory role: a randomized trial.通过“虚拟”监督角色增强动机:一项随机试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Apr 14;15:76. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0348-8.
8
Developing effective web-based regional anesthesia education: a randomized study evaluating case-based versus non-case-based module design.开发有效的基于网络的区域麻醉教育:一项评估基于案例与非基于案例模块设计的随机研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):336-42. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182204d8c.
9
Surgical resident learning styles: faculty and resident accuracy at identification of preferences and impact on ABSITE scores.外科住院医师学习风格:教员和住院医师对偏好的识别准确性及其对 ABSITE 分数的影响。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.050. Epub 2013 May 10.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative Complications Curriculum for the OB/GYN Resident: A Pilot Study.妇产科住院医师围手术期并发症课程:一项试点研究。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Oct 22;8:193. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000193.1. eCollection 2019.
2
Enhancing Examination Success: the Cumulative Benefits of Self-Assessment Questions and Virtual Patient Cases.提高考试成功率:自我评估问题和虚拟患者案例的累积益处。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Aug 4;32(5):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01568-z. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Comparing computer-assisted learning activities for learning clinical neuroscience: a randomized control trial.
比较计算机辅助学习活动在临床神经科学学习中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 3;22(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03578-2.
4
Preparing Neurology Residents and Advanced Practice Providers for the COVID-19 ICU-A Neurocritical Care Led Intervention.为神经科住院医师和高级实践提供者开展针对COVID-19重症监护病房的培训——一项由神经重症护理主导的干预措施。
Neurohospitalist. 2021 Oct;11(4):342-347. doi: 10.1177/19418744211016220. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Using an Adaptive, Self-Directed Web-Based Learning Module to Enhance Residents' Medical Knowledge Prior to a New Clinical Rotation.使用基于网络的自适应自主学习模块,在新的临床轮转之前增强住院医师的医学知识。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 15;29(3):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00772-8. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Transition-to-residency: pilot innovative, online case-based curriculum for medical students preparing for pediatric internships.从实习到住院医师培训阶段的过渡:为准备儿科实习的医学生设计创新的、基于在线病例的课程。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1892569. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1892569.
7
A Required Ophthalmology Rotation: Providing Medical Students with a Foundation in Eye-Related Diagnoses and Management.必修眼科轮转:为医学生奠定眼部相关诊断和治疗基础。
MedEdPORTAL. 2021 Feb 12;17:11100. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11100.
8
Home Surgical Skill Training Resources for Obstetrics and Gynecology Trainees During a Pandemic.疫情期间妇产科住院医师家庭手术技能培训资源。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;136(1):56-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003931.
9
Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of a work-based mentoring programme to develop clinical reasoning on patient outcome: A stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.基于工作的导师制培养临床推理能力以改善患者结局的临床效果评价:一项 stepped wedge 型群组随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220110. eCollection 2019.
10
How We Evaluate Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Systematic Review.我们如何评估医学研究生电子学习:系统综述。
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 5;5(1):e13128. doi: 10.2196/13128.