Bassani Diego Garcia, da Silva Carina Maciel, Oppermann Rui Vicente
Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Rua Prudente de Morais 421, Novo Hamburgo, RS 93520-810, Canoas, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2006 Feb;22(2):277-83. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000200005. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
The aim of the present study was to validate two versions of CPITN for periodontitis diagnosis. A sample of 400 individuals underwent full mouth periodontal examination including Clinical Attachment Loss, Periodontal Pocket Depth, and Sub-gingival Calculus. Full and partial CPITN versions were derived from this exam (gold standard). Contingency tables were constructed and operational characteristics obtained, as well as ROC curves. The results show 58% sensitivity for full CPITN and 80.6% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 87% and 46.3%, respectively. According to the test, estimated periodontitis prevalence was 46%, while the figure obtained with the gold standard was 69%. The partial version of the CPITN showed 50% sensitivity and 87.1% specificity. Positive and negative predictive values were 89.6% and 43.9%, respectively. Estimated periodontitis prevalence, through partial CPITN, was 30.5%. Adjusted global agreement (kappa) for partial and full CPITN was 0.32 and 0.29, respectively. Both CPITN versions disagreed significantly with gold standard results (chi-square p < 0.001). As a conclusion, both total and partial CPITN failed to reflect the real periodontal status of the sample.
本研究的目的是验证用于牙周炎诊断的两个版本的社区牙周指数(CPITN)。400名个体的样本接受了全口牙周检查,包括临床附着丧失、牙周袋深度和龈下牙石。完整和部分CPITN版本均源自该检查(金标准)。构建了列联表并获得了操作特征以及ROC曲线。结果显示完整CPITN的灵敏度为58%,特异度为80.6%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为87%和46.3%。根据该测试,估计的牙周炎患病率为46%,而通过金标准获得的数字为69%。CPITN的部分版本显示灵敏度为50%,特异度为87.1%。阳性和阴性预测值分别为89.6%和43.9%。通过部分CPITN估计的牙周炎患病率为30.5%。部分和完整CPITN的校正总体一致性(kappa)分别为0.32和0.29。两个CPITN版本与金标准结果均存在显著差异(卡方检验p<0.001)。结论是,完整和部分CPITN均未能反映样本的真实牙周状况。