de Almeida Fernanda Ribeiro, Ayas Najib T, Otsuka Ryo, Ueda Hiroshi, Hamilton Peter, Ryan Frank C, Lowe Alan A
Division of Orthodontics, Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, 2199 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z3.
Sleep Breath. 2006 Jun;10(2):62-9. doi: 10.1007/s11325-005-0042-x.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease. Given the costs of in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG), alternative ambulatory methods for accurate diagnosis are desirable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of a simple device (SleepCheck) to identify patients with sleep apnea. A total of 30 consecutive patients with suspected OSA syndrome referred to the sleep clinic were prospectively evaluated with standard PSG and SleepCheck simultaneously during an in-laboratory, supervised full-night diagnostic study. The PSG apnea and hypopnea index (AHI) was evaluated according to standard criteria, and SleepCheck assessed the respiratory disturbance index (RDI) based on nasal cannula pressure fluctuations. Compared to the full-night PSG, SleepCheck systematically overscored respiratory events (the mean difference between SleepCheck RDI and PSG AHI was 27.4+/-13.3 events per hour). This overscoring was in part related to normal physiologic decreases in flow during rapid eye movement sleep or after an arousal. However, there was reasonable correlation between AHI and RDI (r=0.805). Receiver operating characteristic curves with threshold values of AHI of 10 and 20/h demonstrated areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.915 and 0.910, respectively. Optimum combinations of sensitivity and specificity for these thresholds were calculated as 86.4/75.0 and 88.9/81.0, respectively. Overall, the SleepCheck substantially overscored apneas and hypopneas in patients with suspected OSA. However, after correction of the bias, the SleepCheck had reasonable accuracy with an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity similar to other ambulatory type 4 devices currently available.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种常见疾病。鉴于实验室多导睡眠图(PSG)的成本,需要有准确诊断的替代门诊方法。本研究的目的是评估一种简单设备(SleepCheck)识别睡眠呼吸暂停患者的性能。在实验室监督下进行的全夜诊断研究中,对连续30例转诊至睡眠诊所的疑似OSA综合征患者同时进行标准PSG和SleepCheck的前瞻性评估。根据标准标准评估PSG呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI),SleepCheck根据鼻导管压力波动评估呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)。与全夜PSG相比,SleepCheck系统性地高估了呼吸事件(SleepCheck RDI与PSG AHI之间的平均差异为每小时27.4±13.3次事件)。这种高估部分与快速眼动睡眠期间或觉醒后正常的生理流量下降有关。然而,AHI与RDI之间存在合理的相关性(r=0.805)。AHI阈值为10和20/小时的受试者工作特征曲线显示曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.915和0.910。这些阈值的敏感性和特异性的最佳组合分别计算为86.4/75.0和88.9/81.0。总体而言,SleepCheck在疑似OSA患者中对呼吸暂停和低通气的评分大幅高估。然而,在纠正偏差后,SleepCheck具有合理的准确性,其AUC、敏感性和特异性与目前可用的其他门诊4型设备相似。