Pittman Stephen D, Pillar Giora, Berry Richard B, Malhotra Atul, MacDonald Mary M, White David P
Division of Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115-5817, USA.
Sleep Breath. 2006 Sep;10(3):123-31. doi: 10.1007/s11325-006-0058-x.
This study aimed to assess the accuracy of a wrist-worn device based on peripheral arterial tonometry (Watch_PAT 100) to detect residual episodes of respiratory disturbance during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Concurrent polysomnography was used as the reference standard to identify sleep disordered breathing (SDB) events. The study was conducted in three sleep laboratories affiliated with tertiary care academic medical centers. Seventy patients using CPAP to treat obstructive sleep apnea for at least 3 months, following an in-laboratory titration to determine the optimal therapeutic positive airway pressure, participated in this study. Symptoms indicating suboptimal therapy were not required for participation, but self-reported adherence to CPAP therapy was necessary for inclusion. Interventions are not applicable in this study. The accuracy of the PAT-derived respiratory disturbance index (PAT RDI scored by automated algorithm) to detect residual SDB on CPAP was assessed against polysomnography (PSG) using Bland-Altman analysis, receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves, and likelihood ratios for increasing (LR+) and decreasing (LR-) the probability of moderate-severe SDB in the study population. Respiratory events on the PSG were quantified using standard criteria for research investigations ("Chicago criteria") to yield a PSG RDI.C. Based on the PSG results, 19% of the participants had moderate-severe SDB (PSG RDI.C>15 events per hour) on their prescribed pressure. For PAT RDI >15 events per hour, the area under the ROC curve was 0.95 (SE 0.03, p < 0.0001, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.00), the LR+ was 8.04 (95% CI 3.64-17.7), and the LR- was 0.17 (95% CI 0.05-0.62). The mean difference between the PAT RDI and PSG RDI.C was three (2SD 14.5) events per hour. Therefore, residual moderate-severe SDB on CPAP was not uncommon in a multicenter population self-reporting adherence to CPAP therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea. The Watch_PAT device accurately identified participants with moderate-severe SDB while using CPAP in the attended setting of a sleep laboratory.
本研究旨在评估一种基于外周动脉张力测定法的腕部佩戴设备(Watch_PAT 100)在持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗期间检测呼吸紊乱残留发作的准确性。同步多导睡眠图被用作识别睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)事件的参考标准。该研究在隶属于三级医疗学术医学中心的三个睡眠实验室进行。70名使用CPAP治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停至少3个月的患者,在经过实验室滴定以确定最佳治疗气道正压后,参与了本研究。参与研究不需要有表明治疗效果欠佳的症状,但必须自我报告对CPAP治疗的依从性才能纳入。本研究不适用干预措施。使用布兰德-奥特曼分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线以及增加(LR+)和降低(LR-)研究人群中中重度SDB概率的似然比,评估基于PAT得出的呼吸紊乱指数(通过自动算法评分的PAT RDI)检测CPAP上残留SDB的准确性。使用研究调查的标准标准(“芝加哥标准”)对多导睡眠图上的呼吸事件进行量化,以得出多导睡眠图RDI.C。根据多导睡眠图结果,19%的参与者在其规定压力下存在中重度SDB(多导睡眠图RDI.C>每小时15次事件)。对于每小时PAT RDI>15次事件,ROC曲线下面积为0.95(SE 0.03,p<0.0001,95%CI 0.89至1.00),LR+为8.04(95%CI 3.64 - 17.7),LR-为0.17(95%CI 0.05 - 0.62)。PAT RDI与多导睡眠图RDI.C之间的平均差异为每小时3次(2SD 14.5)事件。因此,在一个自我报告依从CPAP治疗以治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的多中心人群中,CPAP上残留的中重度SDB并不罕见。在睡眠实验室的有人值守环境中使用CPAP时,Watch_PAT设备能准确识别出患有中重度SDB的参与者。