Suppr超能文献

痴呆症神经精神症状的药物治疗:证据综述

Pharmacological treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia: a review of the evidence.

作者信息

Franco Kathleen N, Messinger-Rapport Barbara

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Mar;7(3):201-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.12.024. Epub 2006 Feb 7.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE

Systemic review of double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of medication efficacy in the treatment of patients diagnosed with dementia and experiencing neuropsychiatric symptoms(hallucinations, delusions, agitation, aggression, combativeness, wandering).

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies were excluded if they reported only depression, if the medication was not available no longer used in the United States, or duplicated another study already included.

DATA SOURCES

Medline of English articles between 1966 and June 2004, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and a manual search by the authors for other relevant articles.

OUTCOMES

Diverse outcome measures ranging from global benefit to behavioral rating scales. Some of the 29 reports listed several instruments; in total, 24 rating scales were used. Statistical outcome was described and some, but not all, noted clinical impression. Adverse outcomes were listed.

RESULTS

The results were clustered in groups: conventional antipsychotics, atypicals, antidepressants, cholinesterase inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and others. Treatment duration ranged from 17 days to 16 weeks. Types of dementia and levels of severity varied. The authors reported little benefit and some evidence for harm for typical (or conventional) agents. In contrast, some RCTs of atypical antipsychotics reported "modest" benefit, with olanzapine and risperidone leading others. Although trials reported minimal side effects at low doses, authors acknowledged an increased risk for stroke. No studies adequately compared benefit of typical with atypical agents. With the possible exception of citalopram, antidepressant agents did not reduce agitation, but did improve depression. Cholinesterase inhibiting agents demonstrated significant efficacy toward behavior, while memantine had mixed results. Valproate did not prove to be efficacious, and results for carbamazepine were conflicting.

摘要

研究设计与目的

对双盲、安慰剂对照、随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价,并对诊断为痴呆且伴有神经精神症状(幻觉、妄想、激越、攻击行为、好斗、徘徊)的患者的药物疗效进行荟萃分析。

排除标准

若研究仅报告抑郁情况、药物在美国已不再可得或已不再使用,或重复已纳入的另一项研究,则将其排除。

数据来源

1966年至2004年6月期间的英文文章Medline、Cochrane系统评价数据库,以及作者对其他相关文章的手工检索。

结果指标

从整体获益到行为评定量表等多种结果指标。29篇报告中有一些列出了多种工具;总共使用了24种评定量表。描述了统计结果,部分(但并非全部)提及了临床印象。列出了不良结果。

结果

结果分为几组:传统抗精神病药物、非典型抗精神病药物、抗抑郁药、胆碱酯酶抑制剂、心境稳定剂及其他。治疗时长从17天至16周不等。痴呆类型和严重程度各异。作者报告称,典型(或传统)药物获益甚微且有一些危害证据。相比之下,一些非典型抗精神病药物的随机对照试验报告了“适度”获益,奥氮平和利培酮领先于其他药物。尽管试验报告低剂量时副作用最小,但作者承认中风风险增加。没有研究充分比较典型药物与非典型药物的获益情况。除西酞普兰外,抗抑郁药未减轻激越,但改善了抑郁。胆碱酯酶抑制剂对行为显示出显著疗效,而美金刚的结果不一。丙戊酸盐未被证明有效,卡马西平的结果相互矛盾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验