González-Badillo Juan José, Izquierdo Mikel, Gorostiaga Esteban M
Spanish Olympic Committee, Madrid, Spain.
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Feb;20(1):73-81. doi: 10.1519/R-16284.1.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of 3 volumes of heavy resistance, average relative training intensity (expressed as a percentage of 1 repetition maximum that represented the absolute kilograms lifted divided by the number of repetitions performed) programs on maximal strength (1RM) in Snatch (Sn), Clean & Jerk (C&J), and Squat (Sq). Twenty-nine experienced (>3 years), trained junior weightlifters were randomly assigned into 1 of 3 groups: low-intensity group (LIG; n = 12), moderate-intensity group (MIG; n = 9), and high-intensity group (HIG; n = 8). All subjects trained for 10 weeks, 4-5 days a week, in a periodized routine using the same exercises and training volume (expressed as total number of repetitions performed at intensities equal to or greater than 60% of 1RM), but different programmed total repetitions at intensities of >90-100% of 1RM for the entire 10-week period: LIG (46 repetitions), MIG (93 repetitions), and HIG (184 repetitions). During the training period, MIG and LIG showed a significant increase (p < 0.01-0.05) for C&J (10.5% and 3% for MIG and LIG, respectively) and Sq (9.5% and 5.3% for MIG and LIG, respectively), whereas in HIG the increase took place only in Sq (6.9%, p < 0.05). A calculation of effect sizes revealed greater strength gains in the MIG than in HIG or LIG. There were no significant differences between LIG and HIG training volume-induced strength gains. All the subjects in HIG were unable to fully accomplish the repetitions programmed at relative intensities greater than 90% of 1RM. The present results indicate that short-term resistance training using moderate volumes of high relative intensity tended to produce higher enhancements in weightlifting performance compared with low and high volumes of high relative training intensities of equal total volume in experienced, trained young weightlifters. Therefore, for the present population of weightlifters, it may be beneficial to use the MIG training protocol to improve the weightlifting program at least in a short-term (10 weeks) cycle of training.
本研究的目的是检验3种不同训练量的大负荷、平均相对训练强度(以1次最大重复量的百分比表示,即举起的绝对千克数除以完成的重复次数)训练方案对抓举(Sn)、挺举(C&J)和深蹲(Sq)最大力量(1RM)的影响。29名经验丰富(>3年)的青少年举重运动员被随机分为3组:低强度组(LIG;n = 12)、中等强度组(MIG;n = 9)和高强度组(HIG;n = 8)。所有受试者进行为期10周、每周4 - 5天的周期性常规训练,采用相同的练习动作和训练量(以等于或大于1RM的60%强度下完成的重复总数表示),但在整个10周期间,1RM强度大于90 - 100%时的计划总重复次数不同:LIG(46次重复)、MIG(93次重复)和HIG(184次重复)。在训练期间,MIG组和LIG组的挺举(MIG组和LIG组分别提高10.5%和3%)和深蹲(MIG组和LIG组分别提高9.5%和5.3%)有显著增加(p < 0.01 - 0.05),而HIG组仅深蹲有增加(6.9%,p < 0.05)。效应量计算显示,MIG组的力量增长大于HIG组或LIG组。LIG组和HIG组训练量引起的力量增长无显著差异。HIG组的所有受试者均无法完全完成相对强度大于1RM的90%时计划的重复次数。目前的结果表明,在经验丰富、受过训练的年轻举重运动员中,与相同总量的低训练量和高训练量的高相对训练强度相比,采用中等训练量的高相对强度进行短期阻力训练往往能使举重成绩有更高的提升。因此,对于目前的举重运动员群体,至少在短期(10周)训练周期内,采用MIG训练方案可能有利于改进举重训练计划。