Antunes Joaquim Paulo, Oliveira Rafael, Reis Victor Machado, Romero Félix, Moutão João, Brito João Paulo
Sports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Life Quality Research Centre, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 10;10(12):2499. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122499.
Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p < 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p < 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p < 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.
在几乎所有运动项目的疲劳控制和适应过程中,负荷管理都是一个极其重要的课题。在奥运会举重项目中,负荷变量包括强度和量。然而,目前尚不清楚所有练习是否会产生相同程度的疲劳。因此,本研究旨在比较挺举和抓举及其衍生练习分别在男性和女性参与者中引发的疲劳情况。我们采用了实验性定量设计,通过执行一组10个奥运会举重项目中最常用的动作及其衍生动作(抓举、抓举拉、肌肉抓举、力量抓举和后深蹲;挺举、力量翻、翻、高翻和悬垂力量翻),对至少有两年举重经验的成年个体诱导疲劳。各练习之间的强度和量保持相等(四组,每组三次重复),之后进行一次抓举拉测试,评估速度、运动范围和平均功率的变化作为疲劳指标。九名女性和十二名男性参与了该研究(年龄分别为29.67±5.74岁和28.17±5.06岁)。主要结果表明,与力量抓举(p = 0.008;效应量= 0.638)、抓举(p < 0.001;效应量= 0.998)、抓举拉(p < 0.001,效应量= 0.906)和后深蹲(p < 0.001;效应量= 0.906)相比,抓举拉测试的峰值速度值更高,而抓举拉测试与挺举衍生动作之间的差异几乎不存在。研究得出结论,在所分析的大多数练习之间,疲劳诱导存在差异,因此,教练和运动员可以通过考虑每个动作所诱导的疲劳来改进训练计划的制定。