Suppr超能文献

经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐对恶性疟原虫感染的蚊子比对间日疟原虫感染的蚊子更具防护作用吗?

Are insecticide-treated bednets more protective against Plasmodium falciparum than Plasmodium vivax-infected mosquitoes?

作者信息

Bockarie Moses J, Dagoro Henry

机构信息

Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 378, Madang, Papua New Guinea.

出版信息

Malar J. 2006 Feb 21;5:15. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-5-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcomes of insecticide-treated bednet (ITN) interventions for malaria control in Papua New Guinea tend to suggest a differential protective effect against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Little is known about the impact of ITNs on the relative abundance of mosquitoes infected with either P. falciparum or P. vivax. This paper describes the biting cycle of P. falciparum and P. vivax-infected mosquitoes and the impact of an ITN intervention on the proportion of mosquitoes infected with either parasite species.

METHODS

Entomological investigations were performed in East Sepik (ESP) and New Ireland Provinces (NIP) of PNG. Mosquitoes were collected using the all-night (18:00-06:00) landing catch and CDC light-trap methods and species specific malaria sporozoite rates were determined by ELISA.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The distribution of sporozoite positive mosquitoes in three four-hour periods (18:00-22:00, 22:00-02:00 & 02:00-06:00) showed that a higher proportion of P. vivax-infected mosquitoes were biting before people retired to bed under the protection of bednets. In the intervention village, the 308 mosquitoes collected before ITNs were introduced included eight (2.0%) P. falciparum-positive and four (1.0%) P. vivax-positive specimens, giving a parasite ratio of 2:1. The sporozoite rate determined from 908 mosquitoes caught after ITNs were introduced showed a significant decrease for P. falciparum (0.7%) and a slight increase for P. vivax (1.3%), resulting in a post intervention parasite ratio of 1:2. In the East Sepik Province, where ITNs were not used, P. falciparum remained the dominant species in 12 monthly mosquito collections and monthly P. falciparum:P. vivax formula varied from 8:1 to 1.2:1.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that people sleeping under treated bednets may be more exposed to P. vivax than P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes before going to sleep under the protection of bednets. This difference in the biting behaviour of mosquitoes infected with different malaria parasites may partly explain the change in the P. falciparum:P. vivax formula after the introduction of ITNs.

摘要

背景

在巴布亚新几内亚,经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)用于疟疾防控的效果往往显示出对恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫有不同的保护作用。关于ITN对感染恶性疟原虫或间日疟原虫的蚊子相对丰度的影响,人们了解甚少。本文描述了感染恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的蚊子的叮咬周期,以及ITN干预措施对感染这两种寄生虫的蚊子比例的影响。

方法

在巴布亚新几内亚的东塞皮克省(ESP)和新爱尔兰省(NIP)进行了昆虫学调查。使用通宵(18:00 - 06:00)人饵诱捕法和疾控中心灯光诱捕法收集蚊子,并通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)确定特定物种的疟疾子孢子率。

结果与讨论

在三个四小时时间段(18:00 - 22:00、22:00 - 02:00和02:00 - 06:00)内,子孢子阳性蚊子的分布情况表明,在人们睡在蚊帐保护之下之前,感染间日疟原虫的蚊子叮咬比例更高。在干预村庄,在引入ITN之前收集的308只蚊子中,有8只(2.0%)恶性疟原虫阳性和4只(1.0%)间日疟原虫阳性标本,寄生虫比例为2:1。在引入ITN后捕获的908只蚊子中确定的子孢子率显示,恶性疟原虫显著下降(0.7%),间日疟原虫略有上升(1.3%),干预后的寄生虫比例为1:2。在未使用ITN的东塞皮克省,在12次月度蚊子收集样本中,恶性疟原虫仍然是优势物种,每月恶性疟原虫与间日疟原虫的比例从8:1到1.2:1不等。

结论

这些研究结果表明,睡在经处理蚊帐下的人在睡在蚊帐保护之下之前,可能比感染恶性疟原虫的蚊子更容易接触到感染间日疟原虫的蚊子。感染不同疟疾寄生虫的蚊子在叮咬行为上的这种差异,可能部分解释了引入ITN后恶性疟原虫与间日疟原虫比例的变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7774/1388224/bd8ae391a22e/1475-2875-5-15-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验