• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉施分析验证嗓音障碍指数

Validation of the voice handicap index using Rasch analysis.

作者信息

Bogaardt H C A, Hakkesteegt M M, Grolman W, Lindeboom R

机构信息

Department of Phoniatrics and Otolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Voice. 2007 May;21(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.007. Epub 2006 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.007
PMID:16504469
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Voice Handicap Index is a tool for measuring the psychosocial consequences of voice disorders and consists of three dimensions. Previous psychometric evaluation of the VHI focused on the classic evaluation of reliability and validity, which is sample dependent. The authors used Rasch analysis to re-examine the dimensionality of the VHI and to produce item and scale statistics that are less sample dependent. In addition, they provide estimates of VHI item and person severities that are reported on the same logit unit scale, allowing a more straightforward interpretation of a VHI test score.

PATIENTS

Dysphonic patients (N = 530), who were referred for phoniatric examination, filled out the VHI.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis revealed two truly uni-dimensional constructs: the 20-item psychosocial scale and the 9-item physical-functional scale. Logit item severity measures ranged from -2.1 to +2.7. Person severity scores ranged from -4.4 to + 4.4 logits. The internal consistency of the reduced scales was similar to that of the original total VHI (0.95 and 0.84). The VHI consisted of two uni-dimensional constructs. Raw test scores can be transformed into logit unit severity measures, making the VHI more suitable for evaluating the effectiveness of voice-related therapy.

摘要

背景

嗓音障碍指数是一种用于衡量嗓音障碍心理社会后果的工具,由三个维度组成。先前对嗓音障碍指数的心理测量评估主要集中在可靠性和有效性的经典评估上,这取决于样本。作者使用拉施分析重新审视嗓音障碍指数的维度,并生成较少依赖样本的项目和量表统计数据。此外,他们提供了在相同对数单位量表上报告的嗓音障碍指数项目和个体严重程度估计值,从而使嗓音障碍指数测试分数的解释更加直接。

患者

因嗓音疾病接受嗓音科检查的发声障碍患者(N = 530)填写了嗓音障碍指数。

结果

拉施分析揭示了两个真正的单维结构:20项心理社会量表和9项身体功能量表。对数项目严重程度测量范围为-2.1至+?2.7。个体严重程度得分范围为-4.4至+ 4.4对数。简化后量表的内部一致性与原始总嗓音障碍指数相似(分别为0.95和0.84)。嗓音障碍指数由两个单维结构组成。原始测试分数可以转换为对数单位严重程度测量值,这使得嗓音障碍指数更适合评估嗓音相关治疗的效果。 (原文中“+2.7”处可能有误,已按原文翻译)

相似文献

1
Validation of the voice handicap index using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析验证嗓音障碍指数
J Voice. 2007 May;21(3):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.007. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
2
[Adaptation and validation to the Spanish of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) and its shortened version (VHI-10)].[嗓音障碍指数(VHI - 30)及其简化版(VHI - 10)的西班牙语改编与验证]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007 Nov;58(9):386-92.
3
[Voice disorders in female teachers assessed by Voice Handicap Index].[采用嗓音障碍指数评估女教师的嗓音障碍]
Med Pr. 2007;58(5):393-402.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Voice Handicap Index into Italian.嗓音障碍指数的跨文化调适与义大利验证。
J Voice. 2010 Nov;24(6):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.05.006. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
5
Correlation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure (V-RQOL).嗓音障碍指数(VHI)与嗓音相关生活质量量表(V-RQOL)的相关性。
J Voice. 2007 Nov;21(6):723-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
6
The Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and the Vocal Handicap Index (VHI): a comparison of structure and content.嗓音症状量表(VoiSS)与嗓音障碍指数(VHI):结构与内容比较
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Apr;29(2):169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00775.x.
7
Voice-related Quality of Life in laryngectomees: assessment using the VHI and V-RQOL symptom scales.喉切除患者与嗓音相关的生活质量:使用嗓音障碍指数(VHI)和嗓音相关生活质量(V-RQOL)症状量表进行评估。
J Voice. 2007 Nov;21(6):728-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.008. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
8
[Applicability of Voice Handicap Index to the evaluation of voice therapy effectiveness in teachers].嗓音障碍指数在教师嗓音治疗效果评估中的适用性
Med Pr. 2007;58(6):501-9.
9
[Comparison of VHI scores in teachers with voice disorders and the non-professional dysphonic population].[嗓音障碍教师与非专业嗓音障碍人群的嗓音障碍指数(VHI)得分比较]
Med Pr. 2009;60(4):283-8.
10
[Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Voice Handicap Index].《嗓音障碍指数土耳其语版的信度与效度》
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):139-47.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of Rasch analysis and item response theory in otolaryngology: Implications and future possibilities.耳鼻喉科学中拉施分析和项目反应理论的范围综述:影响与未来可能性
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jan 6;9(1):e1208. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1208. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Fibreoptic Laryngoscopic Assessment of Patients with Hoarseness: A Cross-sectional Analysis.声音嘶哑患者的纤维喉镜评估:一项横断面分析。
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;12(2):12-16. doi: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_75_22. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
3
Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment.
缩小科学与临床之间的差距:学术和专业实践的经验教训 - 第 A 部分:声音质量的知觉 - 听觉判断、声学嗓音信号分析和嗓音自我评估。
Codas. 2022 Aug 1;34(5):e20210240. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021240pt. eCollection 2022.
4
Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation.与声音相关的患者报告结局指标:仪器开发与验证的系统评价
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):62-88. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0022.
5
Functional dysphonia: strategies to improve patient outcomes.功能性发声障碍:改善患者预后的策略
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015 Dec 1;6:243-53. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S68631. eCollection 2015.
6
Manual therapy and exercise to improve outcomes in patients with muscle tension dysphonia: a case series.手法治疗与运动改善肌张力障碍性发声障碍患者的疗效:病例系列
Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;95(1):117-28. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130547. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
7
Developing the communicative participation item bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dysphonia sample.开发沟通参与项目库:痉挛性发声障碍样本的拉施分析结果
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Oct;52(5):1302-20. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0275). Epub 2009 Aug 28.