Hunter Lauren P
San Diego State University, College of Health and Human Services, School of Nursing, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-4158, USA.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006 Mar-Apr;51(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.11.009.
This article examines two differing health paradigms, their language, and their effect on the culture of Western childbirth practices. Specifically, the differences in perspectives and language between the dominant paradigm/culture (the biomedical model of curing) and the alternative paradigm/culture (a holistic model of caring) are explored. Examples of language from the medical, midwifery, and nursing literature that affect childbirth culture and the care of childbearing women and their families are examined. The use of language as a tool of power and its known and postulated effects on the childbirth experience, nursing care, midwifery practice, and holistic care are explored. The author argues for the use of a woman-centered paradigm for childbirth experiences.
本文探讨了两种不同的健康范式、它们的语言以及它们对西方分娩实践文化的影响。具体而言,探究了主流范式/文化(生物医学治疗模式)与替代范式/文化(整体护理模式)在观点和语言上的差异。研究了医学、助产和护理文献中影响分娩文化以及孕产妇及其家庭护理的语言示例。探讨了语言作为一种权力工具的运用及其对分娩体验、护理、助产实践和整体护理已知的和假定的影响。作者主张采用以女性为中心的范式来对待分娩体验。