Forterre Patrick
Biologie Moléculaire du Gène Chez les Extrêmophiles, Institut Pasteur, 25, Rue du Dr. Roux, 75015 Paris, France.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3669-74. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510333103. Epub 2006 Feb 27.
The division of the living world into three cellular domains, Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, is now generally accepted. However, there is no consensus about the evolutionary relationships among these domains, because all of the proposed models have a number of more or less severe pitfalls. Another drawback of current models for the universal tree of life is the exclusion of viruses, otherwise a major component of the biosphere. Recently, it was suggested that the transition from RNA to DNA genomes occurred in the viral world, and that cellular DNA and its replication machineries originated via transfers from DNA viruses to RNA cells. Here, I explore the possibility that three such independent transfers were at the origin of Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, respectively. The reduction of evolutionary rates following the transition from RNA to DNA genomes would have stabilized the three canonical versions of proteins involved in translation, whereas the existence of three different founder DNA viruses explains why each domain has its specific DNA replication apparatus. In that model, plasmids can be viewed as transitional forms between DNA viruses and cellular chromosomes, and the formation of different levels of cellular organization (prokaryote or eukaryote) could be traced back to the nature of the founder DNA viruses and RNA cells.
将生物界划分为古菌、细菌和真核生物这三个细胞域,如今已被广泛接受。然而,对于这些域之间的进化关系尚无共识,因为所有提出的模型都存在或多或少的严重缺陷。当前通用生命树模型的另一个缺点是排除了病毒,而病毒在生物圈中原本是主要组成部分。最近有人提出,从RNA基因组到DNA基因组的转变发生在病毒界,并且细胞DNA及其复制机制起源于从DNA病毒到RNA细胞的转移。在此,我探讨了这样一种可能性,即分别有三次这样的独立转移是古菌、细菌和真核生物起源的原因。从RNA基因组转变为DNA基因组后进化速率的降低,会使参与翻译的三种典型蛋白质版本得以稳定,而三种不同的创始DNA病毒的存在则解释了为什么每个域都有其特定的DNA复制装置。在该模型中,质粒可被视为DNA病毒与细胞染色体之间的过渡形式,不同层次细胞组织(原核生物或真核生物)的形成可追溯到创始DNA病毒和RNA细胞的性质。