Suppr超能文献

醋酸甲羟孕酮与文拉法辛治疗潮热的III期比较:北中部癌症治疗组试验N99C7

Phase III comparison of depomedroxyprogesterone acetate to venlafaxine for managing hot flashes: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial N99C7.

作者信息

Loprinzi Charles L, Levitt Ralph, Barton Debra, Sloan Jeff A, Dakhil Shaker R, Nikcevich Daniel A, Bearden James D, Mailliard James A, Tschetter Loren K, Fitch Tom R, Kugler John W

机构信息

Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 20;24(9):1409-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7324. Epub 2006 Feb 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Vasomotor hot flashes are a common problem in menopausal women. Given concerns regarding estrogen and/or combined hormonal therapy, other treatment options are desired. Prior trials have confirmed that progestational agents and newer antidepressants effectively reduce hot flashes. This current trial compared a single intramuscular dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), depot preparation, versus daily oral venlafaxine as treatment for hot flashes.

METHODS

Women with bothersome hot flashes were entered onto this trial, were randomly assigned to treatment, and then had a baseline week where hot flash scores were recorded without treatment. They were then treated and observed for 6 weeks; daily diaries were used to measure hot flash frequencies and severities. There were 109 patients per each arm randomly assigned to receive MPA 400 mg intramuscularly for a single dose versus venlafaxine 37.5 mg per day for a week, then 75 mg per day.

RESULTS

During the sixth week after random assignment, hot flash scores were reduced by 55% in the venlafaxine arm versus 79% in the MPA arm (P < .0001). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 46% of venlafaxine patients (50 of 109) compared with 74% of the MPA patients (81 of 109) had a decrease in hot flashes by more than 50% from baseline (P < .0001). Less toxicity was reported in the MPA arm.

CONCLUSION

A single MPA dose seems to be well tolerated and more effectively reduces hot flashes than does venlafaxine.

摘要

目的

血管舒缩性潮热是绝经后女性的常见问题。鉴于对雌激素和/或联合激素疗法的担忧,人们希望有其他治疗选择。先前的试验已证实孕激素制剂和新型抗抑郁药可有效减少潮热。本试验比较了单剂量肌内注射醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)长效制剂与每日口服文拉法辛治疗潮热的效果。

方法

有令人困扰的潮热的女性进入本试验,被随机分配接受治疗,然后有一个基线周,在此期间记录未经治疗时的潮热评分。然后对她们进行6周的治疗和观察;使用每日日记来测量潮热的频率和严重程度。每组随机分配109名患者,分别接受单次肌内注射400 mg MPA或每日口服37.5 mg文拉法辛一周,然后每日75 mg。

结果

在随机分组后的第六周,文拉法辛组的潮热评分降低了55%,而MPA组降低了79%(P <.0001)。在意向性分析中,46%的文拉法辛患者(109名中的50名)与74%的MPA患者(109名中的81名)潮热较基线水平降低超过50%(P <.0001)。MPA组报告的毒性较小。

结论

单剂量MPA似乎耐受性良好,且比文拉法辛更有效地减少潮热。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验