Drewe Juergen, Bucher Kathleen A, Zahner Catherine
Max Zeller AG, Seeblickstr. 4, 8590 Romanshorn, Switzerland.
Bioconsult GmbH, Rickenbach, Switzerland.
Springerplus. 2015 Feb 10;4:65. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0808-y. eCollection 2015.
The cardinal climacteric symptoms of hot flushes and night sweats affect 24-93% of all women during the physiological transition from reproductive to post-reproductive life. Though efficacious, hormonal therapy and partial oestrogenic compounds are linked to a significant increase in breast cancer. Non-hormonal treatments are thus greatly appreciated. This systematic review of published hormonal and non-hormonal treatments for climacteric, and breast and prostate cancer-associated hot flushes, examines clinical efficacy and therapy-related cancer risk modulation. A PubMed search included literature up to June 19, 2014 without limits for initial dates or language, with the search terms, (hot flush* OR hot flash*) AND (clinical trial* OR clinical stud*) AND (randomi* OR observational) NOT review). Retrieved references identified further papers. The focus was on hot flushes; other symptoms (night sweats, irritability, etc.) were not specifically screened. Included were some 610 clinical studies where a measured effect of the intervention, intensity and severity were documented, and where patients received treatment of pharmaceutical quality. Only 147 of these references described studies with alternative non-hormonal treatments in post-menopausal women and in breast and prostate cancer survivors; these results are presented in Additional file 1. The most effective hot flush treatment is oestrogenic hormones, or a combination of oestrogen and progestins, though benefits are partially outweighed by a significantly increased risk for breast cancer development. This review illustrates that certain non-hormonal treatments, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin/pregabalin, and Cimicifuga racemosa extracts, show a positive risk-benefit ratio. Key pointsSeveral non-hormonal alternatives to hormonal therapy have been established and registered for the treatment of vasomotor climacteric symptoms in peri- and post-menopausal women.There are indications that non-hormonal treatments are useful alternatives in patients with a history of breast and prostate cancer. However, confirmation by larger clinical trials is required.
潮热和盗汗是更年期的主要症状,在女性从生殖期向绝经后期生理过渡阶段,24%至93%的女性会出现这些症状。激素疗法和部分雌激素化合物虽有疗效,但与乳腺癌风险显著增加有关。因此,非激素治疗备受青睐。本系统综述对已发表的用于治疗更年期及与乳腺癌和前列腺癌相关潮热的激素和非激素疗法进行了研究,考察了临床疗效以及与治疗相关的癌症风险调节情况。在PubMed数据库中进行检索,纳入截至2014年6月19日的文献,对起始日期和语言无限制,检索词为(潮热或热潮红)AND(临床试验或临床研究)AND(随机*或观察性)NOT综述)。通过检索到的参考文献查找更多论文。重点关注潮热;未对其他症状(盗汗、易怒等)进行专门筛选。纳入了约610项临床研究,这些研究记录了干预措施的实测效果、强度和严重程度,且患者接受的是药品质量的治疗。其中只有147篇参考文献描述了针对绝经后女性以及乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者的替代性非激素治疗研究;这些结果见附加文件1。最有效的潮热治疗方法是雌激素类激素,或雌激素与孕激素的联合使用,不过乳腺癌发病风险显著增加在一定程度上抵消了这些益处。本综述表明,某些非激素治疗方法,包括选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、加巴喷丁/普瑞巴林以及黑升麻提取物,显示出良好的风险效益比。要点已确立并注册了几种激素疗法的非激素替代方法,用于治疗围绝经期和绝经后女性的血管舒缩性更年期症状。有迹象表明,非激素治疗方法对于有乳腺癌和前列腺癌病史的患者是有用的替代选择。然而,需要更大规模的临床试验予以证实。