Shaw W Douglass, Walker Mark, Benson Marnee
Texas A&M University, Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX, USA.
Risk Anal. 2005 Dec;25(6):1531-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00698.x.
The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 regulates water quality in public drinking water supply systems but does not pertain to private domestic wells, often found in rural areas throughout the country. The recent decision to tighten the drinking water standard for arsenic from 50 parts per billion (ppb) to 10 ppb may therefore affect some households in rural communities, but may not directly reduce health risks for those on private wells. The article reports results from a survey conducted in a U.S. arsenic hot spot, the rural area of Churchill County, Nevada. This area has elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater. We find that a significant proportion of households on private wells are consuming drinking water with arsenic levels that pose a health risk. The decision to treat tap water for those on private wells in this area is modeled, and the predicted probability of treatment is used to help explain drinking water consumption. This probability represents behaviors relating to the household's perception of risk.
1974年的《安全饮用水法》对公共饮用水供应系统中的水质进行监管,但不适用于私人家庭水井,这些水井在全国农村地区很常见。因此,最近将砷的饮用水标准从十亿分之五十(ppb)收紧到十亿分之十的决定可能会影响农村社区的一些家庭,但可能不会直接降低使用私人水井的人群的健康风险。本文报道了在美国砷污染热点地区——内华达州丘吉尔县农村地区进行的一项调查结果。该地区地下水中砷含量升高。我们发现,很大一部分使用私人水井的家庭所饮用的水中砷含量对健康构成风险。我们对该地区为使用私人水井的人群处理自来水的决定进行了建模,并使用预测的处理概率来帮助解释饮用水消费情况。这个概率代表了与家庭风险认知相关的行为。