Schipper Lisa, Pelling Mark
International Water Management Institute, Sri Lanka.
Disasters. 2006 Mar;30(1):19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x.
Reducing losses to weather-related disasters, meeting the Millennium Development Goals and wider human development objectives, and implementing a successful response to climate change are aims that can only be accomplished if they are undertaken in an integrated manner. Currently, policy responses to address each of these independently may be redundant or, at worst, conflicting. We believe that this conflict can be attributed primarily to a lack of interaction and institutional overlap among the three communities of practice. Differences in language, method and political relevance may also contribute to the intellectual divide. Thus, this paper seeks to review the theoretical and policy linkages among disaster risk reduction, climate change and development. It finds that not only does action within one realm affect capacity for action in the others, but also that there is much that can be learnt and shared between realms in order to ensure a move towards a path of integrated and more sustainable development.
减少与天气相关灾害造成的损失、实现千年发展目标及更广泛的人类发展目标,以及成功应对气候变化,这些目标只有以综合方式开展才能实现。目前,针对这些目标各自独立采取的政策应对措施可能会多余,或者在最坏的情况下相互冲突。我们认为,这种冲突主要可归因于三个实践领域之间缺乏互动以及机构重叠。语言、方法和政治相关性方面的差异也可能导致知识鸿沟。因此,本文旨在审视减少灾害风险、气候变化与发展之间的理论和政策联系。研究发现,不仅一个领域内的行动会影响其他领域的行动能力,而且各领域之间有很多经验教训可以相互借鉴和分享,以确保朝着综合、更可持续的发展道路迈进。
Disasters. 2006-3
Disasters. 2006-3
Disasters. 2006-3
Bull World Health Organ. 1997
Water Sci Technol. 2007
J Educ Health Promot. 2025-2-28
BMC Public Health. 2022-6-21
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020-4