Azad S S, Larijani G E, Bartkowski R, Seltzer J L, Weinberger M, Marr A, Goldberg M E
Department of Anesthesiology, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
J Clin Anesth. 1991 May-Jun;3(3):202-6. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90159-k.
To determine the intubating conditions following the administration of pipecuronium bromide in doses of two (0.07 mg/kg) or three (0.1 mg/kg) times ED95 (average dose that gives 95% block of the first twitch).
To compare intubating conditions at 11/2 and 21/2 minutes in 41 patients receiving balanced anesthesia.
Surgical patients at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.
Forty-one patients undergoing surgical procedure who received general anesthesia.
After obtaining a stable baseline of train-of-four (TOF), 41 patients randomly received either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg of pipecuronium as a single intravenous (IV) bolus dose, and the trachea was intubated either at 11/2 or 21/2 minutes.
Intubating conditions at 21/2 minutes appeared significantly better than those at 11/2 minutes, regardless of the pipecuronium dose. The mean time for T1 (first twitch of TOF) to reach 50% and 90% suppression was 1.36 +/- 0.51 minutes and 2.29 +/- 0.8 minutes, respectively, for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 1.07 +/- 0.27 minutes and 1.72 +/- 0.45 minutes, respectively, for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. This did not make a significant difference in intubating conditions at either time. The time to 25% recovery of T1 was 68.2 +/- 22 minutes for the 0.07 mg/kg dose and 121.5 +/- 49 minutes for the 0.1 mg/kg dose. In patients who had spontaneous recovery of T1 to between 10% and 25% of control, administration of neostigmine or edrophonium resulted in identical recovery in 10 minutes. However, in patients with less than 10% spontaneous recovery of T1, neostigmine appeared to be superior to edrophonium.
Pipecuronium has a relatively rapid onset. The trachea could be intubated successfully in 11/2 minutes with a dose of either 0.07 mg/kg or 0.1 mg/kg. If the clinical situation requires perfect relaxation with no movement or bucking, we recommend waiting at least 21/2 minutes.
确定给予两倍(0.07mg/kg)或三倍(0.1mg/kg)ED95(使第一个肌颤搐阻滞达95%的平均剂量)的哌库溴铵后的插管条件。
比较41例接受平衡麻醉患者在1.5分钟和2.5分钟时的插管条件。
托马斯·杰斐逊大学医院的手术患者。
41例接受全身麻醉的手术患者。
在获得稳定的四个成串刺激(TOF)基线后,41例患者随机接受0.07mg/kg或0.1mg/kg的哌库溴铵单次静脉推注剂量,并在1.5分钟或2.5分钟时进行气管插管。
无论哌库溴铵剂量如何,2.5分钟时的插管条件明显优于1.5分钟时。对于0.07mg/kg剂量,T1(TOF的第一个肌颤搐)达到50%和90%抑制的平均时间分别为1.36±0.51分钟和2.29±0.8分钟;对于0.1mg/kg剂量,分别为1.07±0.27分钟和1.72±0.45分钟。这在两个时间点的插管条件上没有显著差异。T1恢复到25%的时间,0.07mg/kg剂量为68.2±22分钟,0.1mg/kg剂量为121.5±49分钟。在T1自发恢复到对照值的10%至25%之间的患者中,给予新斯的明或依酚氯铵可在10分钟内实现相同程度的恢复。然而,在T1自发恢复低于10%的患者中,新斯的明似乎优于依酚氯铵。
哌库溴铵起效相对较快。给予0.07mg/kg或0.1mg/kg剂量可在1.5分钟内成功进行气管插管。如果临床情况需要完美的肌肉松弛,无肢体活动或呛咳,我们建议至少等待2.5分钟。