Suppr超能文献

新斯的明和依酚氯铵用于逆转哌库溴铵的神经肌肉阻滞作用。

Neostigmine and edrophonium for reversal of pipecuronium neuromuscular blockade.

作者信息

Abdulatif M, Naguib M

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1991 Mar;38(2):159-63. doi: 10.1007/BF03008137.

Abstract

Neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 or edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1 were administered to two groups of 15 patients each for antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at 20% spontaneous recovery of the first twitch (T1) of the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. The mean onset of action (+/-SEM) of edrophonium (18.1 +/- 2.4 sec) was significantly more rapid (P less than 0.01) than that of neostigmine (47.6 +/- 4 sec), as were the times taken to attain a TOF ratio of 0.25 and 0.5. Nevertheless, the reversal time (time taken from the end of injection of the antagonist until TOF ratio value had reached 0.75) was significantly shorter (P less than 0.01) in the neostigmine than in the edrophonium group (499.3 +/- 62 vs 767 +/- 52 sec respectively). The TOF ratio ten minutes after reversal was greater in the neostigmine group than in the edrophonium group (P less than 0.01), 0.78 +/- 0.02 vs 0.68 +/- 0.02 min respectively. At that time, 33% (5 out of 15) and 80% (12 out of 15) patients failed to be reversed adequately (TOF ratio of 0.75) after neostigmine 0.06 mg.kg-1 and edrophonium 1 mg.kg-1, respectively. Administration of one additional dose (one-third of the initial dose) of the same antagonist resulted in adequate antagonism in the remaining five patients in the neostigmine group and in nine patients in the edrophonium group. Two such doses were required in the remaining three patients in the latter group. The mean total dose of neostigmine and edrophonium employed in this study was 0.067 +/- 0.002 and 1.3 +/- 0.05 mg.kg-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

将新斯的明0.06mg·kg⁻¹或依酚氯铵1mg·kg⁻¹分别给予两组各15例患者,用于在四个成串刺激(TOF)的第一个肌颤搐(T1)出现20%自发恢复时拮抗哌库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞。依酚氯铵的平均起效时间(±标准误)(18.1±2.4秒)明显快于新斯的明(47.6±4秒)(P<0.01),达到TOF比值0.25和0.5所需的时间也是如此。然而,新斯的明组的恢复时间(从注射拮抗剂结束到TOF比值达到0.75的时间)明显短于依酚氯铵组(分别为499.3±62秒和767±52秒,P<0.01)。恢复后10分钟时,新斯的明组的TOF比值高于依酚氯铵组(P<0.01),分别为0.78±0.02和0.68±0.02。此时,新斯的明0.06mg·kg⁻¹和依酚氯铵1mg·kg⁻¹后,分别有33%(15例中的5例)和80%(15例中的12例)患者未能充分恢复(TOF比值为0.75)。给予额外一剂(初始剂量的三分之一)相同的拮抗剂后,新斯的明组其余5例患者和依酚氯铵组9例患者实现了充分拮抗。依酚氯铵组其余3例患者需要两剂这样的药物。本研究中使用的新斯的明和依酚氯铵的平均总剂量分别为0.067±0.002和1.3±0.05mg·kg⁻¹。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验