Suppr超能文献

阿瑞匹坦方案与多日使用昂丹司琼方案(均联合地塞米松)在高剂量顺铂治疗中抗呕吐疗效的比较。

Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment.

作者信息

Schmoll H J, Aapro M S, Poli-Bigelli S, Kim H-K, Park K, Jordan K, von Pawel J, Giezek H, Ahmed T, Chan C Y

机构信息

Martin Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2006 Jun;17(6):1000-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl019. Epub 2006 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared an aprepitant regimen with a control regimen of ondansetron + dexamethasone given for 4 days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin > or =70 mg/m(2) were randomized to either the aprepitant regimen (aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; aprepitant and dexamethasone on days 2-3; dexamethasone on day 4) or control regimen (ondansetron + dexamethasone on days 1-4). Patients recorded vomiting, nausea and rescue therapy use. The primary end point was complete response (no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy) in the overall phase (days 1-5 post-cisplatin).

RESULTS

Complete response rates were higher in the aprepitant than control group in the overall (72% versus 61%; P = 0.003), acute (day 1; 88% versus 79%; P = 0.005) and delayed phases (days 2-5; 74% versus 63%; P = 0.004), as were rates of no vomiting (overall 77% versus 62%, P < or = 0.001; acute 89% versus 81%, P = 0.004; delayed 79% versus 64%, P < or = 0.001). Rates of no rescue therapy were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with an antiemetic regimen in which ondansetron + dexamethasone were given for 4 days, the aprepitant regimen was superior in the acute, delayed and overall phases of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The aprepitant regimen should be considered a new standard of antiemetic therapy for cisplatin-treated patients. www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NTC00090207.

摘要

背景

我们将阿瑞匹坦方案与昂丹司琼+地塞米松的对照方案进行了为期4天的比较。

患者与方法

计划接受顺铂剂量≥70mg/m²的患者被随机分为阿瑞匹坦方案组(第1天给予阿瑞匹坦、昂丹司琼和地塞米松;第2 - 3天给予阿瑞匹坦和地塞米松;第4天给予地塞米松)或对照方案组(第1 - 4天给予昂丹司琼+地塞米松)。患者记录呕吐、恶心及救援治疗的使用情况。主要终点是整个阶段(顺铂治疗后第1 - 5天)的完全缓解(无呕吐且未使用救援治疗)。

结果

在整个阶段(72%对61%;P = 0.003)、急性期(第1天;88%对79%;P = 0.005)和延迟期(第2 - 5天;74%对63%;P = 0.004),阿瑞匹坦组的完全缓解率高于对照组,无呕吐率也是如此(整个阶段77%对62%,P≤0.001;急性期89%对81%,P = 0.004;延迟期79%对64%,P≤0.001)。两组间未使用救援治疗的比例相似。

结论

与给予4天昂丹司琼+地塞米松的止吐方案相比,阿瑞匹坦方案在化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的急性期、延迟期及整个阶段更具优势。阿瑞匹坦方案应被视为顺铂治疗患者止吐治疗的新标准。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NTC00090207。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验