• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型与传统止吐药物在预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的疗效比较:一项系统评价

Comparative Efficacy of Novel Versus Traditional Antiemetic Agents in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting With Moderate or Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Nashed Sally M, Morcos Rami Kamal A, Atif Muhammad, Shehryar Abdullah, Rehman Abdur, Kumari Reema, Khan Safiyyah M, Hassan Waleed, Zeb Muhammad Roshan, Zia Talha A, Jameel Syed

机构信息

Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EGY.

Department of General Surgery, Ain Shams University Specialized Hospital, Cairo, EGY.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72774. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72774. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.72774
PMID:39618683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11608080/
Abstract

This systematic review critically evaluates the comparative efficacy of novel and traditional antiemetic agents in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC/HEC). The findings suggest that novel agents, such as netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA), olanzapine, and transdermal granisetron (GTDS), offer comparable or superior efficacy to traditional antiemetic regimens, including standard options like aprepitant combined with 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists and corticosteroids. These novel agents demonstrate strong effectiveness in controlling both acute and delayed CINV and offer practical advantages, such as simplified dosing regimens and improved patient adherence, particularly in resource-limited settings. Additionally, traditional regimens incorporating aprepitant remain effective in preventing CINV. However, the review highlights the need for more direct comparisons between novel and traditional agents, as well as further studies evaluating novel therapies in real-world clinical settings. Future research should focus on larger, long-term trials to better establish the role of novel antiemetic agents and optimize CINV management strategies.

摘要

本系统评价批判性地评估了新型和传统止吐药物在预防接受中度或高度致吐性化疗(MEC/HEC)的患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)方面的比较疗效。研究结果表明,新型药物,如奈妥吡坦/帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)、奥氮平和透皮格拉司琼(GTDS),与传统止吐方案(包括阿瑞匹坦联合5-HT₃受体拮抗剂和皮质类固醇等标准方案)相比,具有相当或更好的疗效。这些新型药物在控制急性和迟发性CINV方面显示出强大的有效性,并具有实际优势,如简化给药方案和提高患者依从性,特别是在资源有限的环境中。此外,包含阿瑞匹坦的传统方案在预防CINV方面仍然有效。然而,该评价强调需要对新型和传统药物进行更多直接比较,以及在真实临床环境中评估新型疗法的进一步研究。未来的研究应侧重于更大规模的长期试验,以更好地确立新型止吐药物的作用并优化CINV管理策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a81/11608080/2bea7f344fad/cureus-0016-00000072774-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a81/11608080/2bea7f344fad/cureus-0016-00000072774-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a81/11608080/2bea7f344fad/cureus-0016-00000072774-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy of Novel Versus Traditional Antiemetic Agents in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting With Moderate or Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.新型与传统止吐药物在预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的疗效比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):e72774. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72774. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis.成人止吐药预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2.
3
Efficacy of NEPA, a fixed antiemetic combination of netupitant and palonosetron, vs a 3-day aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Chinese patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in a randomized Phase 3 study.在一项随机 3 期研究中,评估固定剂量奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)与阿瑞匹坦 3 天方案预防中国接受高致吐性化疗(HEC)患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的疗效。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):5134-5142. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3123. Epub 2020 May 30.
4
Evaluation of clinical outcomes and efficacy of palonosetron and granisetron in combination with dexamethasone in Egyptian patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.评价帕洛诺司琼和格拉司琼联合地塞米松在接受高致吐性化疗的埃及患者中的临床结局和疗效。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;88(1):121-129. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04257-7. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
5
Effectiveness of Antiemetic Regimens for Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.止吐方案治疗高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Oncologist. 2019 Jun;24(6):e347-e357. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0140. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
A Pragmatic Study Evaluating NEPA Versus Aprepitant for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy.一项评价奈妥匹坦与阿瑞匹坦预防接受中度致吐性化疗患者化疗所致恶心呕吐的实用研究。
Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):e1870-e1879. doi: 10.1002/onco.13888. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
A randomized phase III study evaluating the efficacy of single-dose NEPA, a fixed antiemetic combination of netupitant and palonosetron, versus an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).一项评价单剂量 NEPA(一种固定的奈妥吡坦和帕洛诺司琼止吐组合)对比阿瑞匹坦方案预防接受高致吐性化疗(HEC)患者化疗所致恶心呕吐(CINV)的疗效的随机 III 期研究。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;29(2):452-458. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx698.
8
Cost-effectiveness of a fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron (NEPA) relative to aprepitant plus granisetron (APR + GRAN) for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a trial-based analysis.奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)与阿瑞匹坦格拉司琼(APR+GRAN)预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的成本效益比较:基于试验的分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):857-866. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04824-y. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
NEPA (Netupitant/Palonosetron) for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Patients Receiving Highly or Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy Who Experienced Breakthrough CINV in Cycle 1 of Chemotherapy: A Phase II Clinical Trial.奈妥匹坦/帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)用于预防接受高致吐性或中度致吐性化疗且在化疗第1周期出现突破性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的患者:一项II期临床试验。
Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70549. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70549.
10
Dexamethasone-Sparing Antiemetic Prophylaxis for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Highly and Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy: The SHEILD Study.地塞米松减量的止吐预防方案用于高度和中度致吐性化疗所致恶心和呕吐:SHEILD研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 26;16(9):e70290. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70290. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-dose NEPA versus an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.单次给予 NEPA 与阿瑞匹坦方案预防接受中度致吐性化疗患者的化疗所致恶心和呕吐。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):15769-15776. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6121. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Efficacy and safety of antiemetic regimens for highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的止吐方案的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Cancer Treat Rev. 2023 Apr;115:102512. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102512. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
3
Efficacy of the granisetron transdermal system for the control of nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
格拉司琼透皮贴剂控制高度致吐性化疗所致恶心呕吐的疗效:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):406-416. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.359. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
4
Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis.成人止吐药预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2.
5
A Pragmatic Study Evaluating NEPA Versus Aprepitant for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy.一项评价奈妥匹坦与阿瑞匹坦预防接受中度致吐性化疗患者化疗所致恶心呕吐的实用研究。
Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):e1870-e1879. doi: 10.1002/onco.13888. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
7
Enhancement strategies for transdermal drug delivery systems: current trends and applications.透皮给药系统的增强策略:当前趋势与应用
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022 Apr;12(4):758-791. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-00909-6. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Study protocol for SPARED trial: randomised non-inferiority phase III trial comparing dexamethasone on day 1 with dexamethasone on days 1-4, combined with neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, palonosetron and olanzapine (5 mg) in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.SPARED 试验方案:比较第 1 天给予地塞米松与第 1-4 天给予地塞米松,联合神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂、帕洛诺司琼和奥氮平(5mg)在接受顺铂为基础化疗的患者中的随机非劣效性 III 期试验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):e041737. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041737.
9
Optimizing antiemetic treatment for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Japan: Update summary of the 2015  Japan Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antiemesis.日本化疗所致恶心和呕吐的止吐治疗优化:2015年日本临床肿瘤学会止吐临床实践指南更新总结
Int J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01818-3. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
10
Efficacy of NEPA, a fixed antiemetic combination of netupitant and palonosetron, vs a 3-day aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Chinese patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in a randomized Phase 3 study.在一项随机 3 期研究中,评估固定剂量奈妥匹坦帕洛诺司琼(NEPA)与阿瑞匹坦 3 天方案预防中国接受高致吐性化疗(HEC)患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的疗效。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):5134-5142. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3123. Epub 2020 May 30.