Hasselström J, Alexander N, Bringel C, Svensson J O, Säwe J
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40(6):585-91. doi: 10.1007/BF00279975.
The single-dose and steady state kinetics of morphine given as controlled-release tablets (30 mg every 12 h) and as a solution (15 mg every 6 h) have been compared in 11 cancer patients with chronic pain. The concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were analyzed by HPLC. There were no significant differences between the tablets and solution in the mean steady state concentrations of morphine, M3G or M6G. The tmax was 3.3 h for the tablets compared to 1.1 h for the solution. After giving the controlled-release tablets every 12 h there was a significantly higher fluctuation index of the morphine concentrations than after the solution. Urinary recovery at steady state was comparable between the two preparations, with averages of 57% and 47%, respectively. Thus, no major differences were found in the pharmacokinetics of morphine and its glucuronidated metabolites after 30 mg morphine as controlled-release tablets every 12 h or 15 mg of morphine solution every 6 h, except for a significantly longer tmax and greater fluctuation in morphine concentrations after the controlled-release tablets.
在11例患有慢性疼痛的癌症患者中,比较了控释片(每12小时30毫克)和溶液剂(每6小时15毫克)形式给予吗啡的单剂量和稳态动力学。通过高效液相色谱法分析吗啡、吗啡-3-葡萄糖醛酸苷(M3G)和吗啡-6-葡萄糖醛酸苷(M6G)的浓度。吗啡、M3G或M6G的平均稳态浓度在片剂和溶液剂之间没有显著差异。片剂的达峰时间为3.3小时,而溶液剂为1.1小时。每12小时给予控释片后,吗啡浓度的波动指数显著高于溶液剂给药后。两种制剂稳态时的尿回收率相当,平均值分别为57%和47%。因此,每12小时给予30毫克控释片吗啡或每6小时给予15毫克吗啡溶液后,除控释片给药后吗啡的达峰时间显著更长且浓度波动更大外,吗啡及其葡萄糖醛酸化代谢产物的药代动力学未发现重大差异。