Suppr超能文献

对由故意感染的献血制备的血小板浓缩物进行无菌检测。

Sterility testing of platelet concentrates prepared from deliberately infected blood donations.

作者信息

Mohr Harald, Lambrecht Bernd, Bayer Anette, Spengler Hans-Peter, Nicol Sven-Boris, Montag Thomas, Müller Thomas H

机构信息

Blood Center of the German Red Cross Chapters of NSTOB, Institutes Springe and Gera, Springe and Gera, Germany.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2006 Mar;46(3):486-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00747.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In general the bacterial count in freshly donated blood is low and even lower in the corresponding platelet concentrates (PCs). By use of flow cytometry (FACS) for sterility testing, the reliability of early versus later sampling times was evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Blood donations were spiked with various numbers of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The corresponding PCs were prepared by the buffy-coat method and stored at 22 degrees C. A 20-mL sample was collected from each PC directly after preparation and after 8 hours. Samples were stored at 35 degrees C. Sterility testing of both PCs and samples was by FACS analysis at different time points.

RESULTS

All stored PCs were found positive by FACS analysis, with detection times ranging between 8 and 24 hours (K. pneumoniae, B. cereus), 8 and 91 hours (S. aureus), and 144 hours (S. epidermidis). In the samples incubated at 35 degrees C, bacteria were detected after 8 to 19 hours (K. pneumoniae, B. cereus), 8 to 67 hours (S. aureus), and 19 to 43 hours (S. epidermidis). Some of the samples did not contain bacteria.

CONCLUSION

Detection times for slow-growing bacteria are significantly shortened when PC samples are incubated at 35 degrees C: the numbers of bacteria in freshly prepared PCs may, however, be so low that the samples drawn for sterility testing do not contain a single bacterium. Our results do not support a shortening of the 24-hour or greater sampling time recommended by the manufacturers of established test systems, because also for consistent detection by FACS, bacteria need to grow in the PCs to sufficient numbers.

摘要

背景

一般来说,新鲜捐献血液中的细菌计数较低,而相应的血小板浓缩物(PCs)中的细菌计数更低。通过使用流式细胞术(FACS)进行无菌检测,评估了早期与后期采样时间的可靠性。

研究设计与方法

向献血中加入不同数量的表皮葡萄球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌。通过白膜层法制备相应的PCs,并在22℃下储存。制备后和8小时后,从每个PC中直接采集20 mL样本。样本在35℃下储存。通过FACS分析在不同时间点对PCs和样本进行无菌检测。

结果

通过FACS分析发现所有储存的PCs均为阳性,检测时间在8至24小时之间(肺炎克雷伯菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌)、8至91小时之间(金黄色葡萄球菌)和144小时(表皮葡萄球菌)。在35℃下孵育的样本中,8至19小时后检测到细菌(肺炎克雷伯菌、蜡样芽孢杆菌)、8至67小时后检测到细菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)、19至43小时后检测到细菌(表皮葡萄球菌)。一些样本不含细菌。

结论

当PC样本在35℃下孵育时,生长缓慢细菌的检测时间显著缩短:然而,新制备的PCs中的细菌数量可能非常低,以至于用于无菌检测的样本中可能不含单个细菌。我们的结果不支持缩短现有检测系统制造商推荐的24小时或更长的采样时间,因为即使要通过FACS进行一致检测,细菌也需要在PCs中生长到足够数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验