• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

顺行性阴囊硬化疗法治疗小儿原发性精索静脉曲张

Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for treating primary varicocele in children.

作者信息

Zaupa Paola, Mayr Johannes, Höllwarth Michael E

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34, A-8036 Graz, Austria.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):809-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06033.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06033.x
PMID:16536779
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and limitations of antegrade sclerotherapy (AS) for the treatment of primary varicocele in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From December 1996 to December 2004, 88 patients (mean age 13.3 years, range 9-18) with primary varicocele underwent AS (91 varicocele ablations in all). The indications for surgery were testicular pain (16 boys, 18%), a large varicocele with cosmetic implications, testicular hypotrophy (one) and in 71 (81%) the varicocele was detected incidentally during a routine physical examination; all were left-sided. According to the classification used by Tauber, 46 (52%) varicoceles were grade II and 42 (48%) grade III. The clinical and ultrasonography (US) results were evaluated over a median (range) follow-up of 11 (3-60) months, and the operative duration, X-ray exposure time, persistence rate of varicoceles and complications were compared with those using other techniques.

RESULTS

In 11 patients there was a palpable difference in size between the testicles, but in only five (6%) was testicular hypotrophy (testicular volume (<75% testicular volume vs the normal side) confirmed by US. The mean (sem) operative duration for AS was 33.2 (2.14) min. In 16 (18%) patients it was necessary to expose a second or third vein because the first vein chosen was unsuitable for sclerotherapy. The mean operative radiation exposure was 2.18 (0.21) s. One patient (1%) was treated with a high ligature of the testicular vein (Palomo procedure) after initial unsuccessful AS, and was excluded from the analysis. Eighty-four (97%) patients were eligible for follow-up: six (7%) had a persistent varicocele (four grade II, two grade III), four of whom had repeat sclerotherapy successfully (no recurrence at follow-up). Fourteen (15%) patients had enlarged testicular veins only on US (varicocele grade 0). No patient developed a hydrocele after AS, There were complications after surgery in three (3%) patients (two superficial wound infections, one scrotal haematoma together with focal testicular necrosis).

CONCLUSIONS

AS is an efficient minimally invasive surgical method for correcting varicoceles in older children, although the operative duration is sometimes longer than in adults, and surgery can be more difficult because of the smaller veins. Partial testicular necrosis, despite correct AS, is a very rare but serious complication.

摘要

目的

评估顺行硬化疗法(AS)治疗儿童原发性精索静脉曲张的有效性及局限性。

患者与方法

1996年12月至2004年12月,88例原发性精索静脉曲张患者(平均年龄13.3岁,范围9 - 18岁)接受了AS治疗(共进行91次精索静脉曲张消融术)。手术指征为睾丸疼痛(16例男孩,18%)、对外观有影响的大精索静脉曲张、睾丸萎缩(1例),71例(81%)在常规体检时偶然发现精索静脉曲张;均为左侧。根据Tauber分类法,46例(52%)精索静脉曲张为II级,42例(48%)为III级。在中位(范围)11(3 - 60)个月的随访期内评估临床及超声(US)结果,并将手术时间、X线暴露时间、精索静脉曲张持续率及并发症与使用其他技术的情况进行比较。

结果

11例患者双侧睾丸大小有可触及的差异,但仅5例(6%)经超声证实存在睾丸萎缩(患侧睾丸体积<正常侧睾丸体积的75%)。AS的平均(标准误)手术时间为33.2(2.14)分钟。16例(18%)患者因所选的第一支静脉不适合硬化治疗而需暴露第二支或第三支静脉。平均手术辐射暴露时间为2.18(0.21)秒。1例患者(1%)在初次AS治疗失败后接受了睾丸静脉高位结扎术(Palomo手术),并被排除在分析之外。84例(97%)患者符合随访条件:6例(7%)存在持续性精索静脉曲张(4例II级,2例III级),其中4例成功接受了重复硬化治疗(随访时无复发)。14例(15%)患者仅超声显示睾丸静脉增粗(精索静脉曲张0级)。AS治疗后无患者发生鞘膜积液。3例(3%)患者术后出现并发症(2例浅表伤口感染,1例阴囊血肿合并局灶性睾丸坏死)。

结论

AS是一种治疗大龄儿童精索静脉曲张的有效微创外科方法,尽管手术时间有时比成人长,且由于静脉较细手术可能更困难。尽管AS操作正确,但部分睾丸坏死是一种非常罕见但严重的并发症。

相似文献

1
Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for treating primary varicocele in children.顺行性阴囊硬化疗法治疗小儿原发性精索静脉曲张
BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):809-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06033.x.
2
Treatment of varicoceles in childhood and adolescence with Tauber's antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy.采用陶伯顺行阴囊硬化疗法治疗儿童及青少年精索静脉曲张。
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Aug;35(8):1222-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.8758.
3
Comparison of scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy and laparoscopic Palomo surgery in treatment of adolescent varicocele: A 15-year review.阴囊内精索前向硬化治疗与腹腔镜 Palomo 手术治疗青少年精索静脉曲张的比较:15 年回顾。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec;14(6):534.e1-534.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 31.
4
Antegrade sclerotherapy in adolescent varicocele patients.青少年精索静脉曲张患者的顺行硬化疗法
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Jun;13(3):305.e1-305.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.12.018. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
5
Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in paediatric, adolescent and young adult varicoceles.阴囊顺行硬化疗法显示了小儿、青少年和年轻成人精索静脉曲张静脉引流的解剖学变异。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Jan;30(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3413-6. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
6
Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy in the treatment of varicocele: a prospective study.顺行性阴囊硬化疗法治疗精索静脉曲张:一项前瞻性研究。
BJU Int. 2002 Feb;89(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02418.x.
7
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Palomo Surgery vs Scrotal Antegrade Sclerotherapy in Adolescent Varicocele.前瞻性随机对照试验比较腹腔镜 Palomo 手术与阴囊前向硬化疗法治疗青少年精索静脉曲张。
J Urol. 2023 Mar;209(3):600-610. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003087. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Surgical treatment of varicocele by a subinguinal approach combined with antegrade intraoperative sclerotherapy of venous vessels.经腹股沟下途径联合术中顺行性静脉血管硬化疗法治疗精索静脉曲张
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):142-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05915.x.
9
[Antegrade scrotal embolization of varicocele: results].精索静脉曲张的顺行阴囊栓塞术:结果
Acta Urol Belg. 1998 Dec;66(4):5-8.
10
Antegrade Sclerotherapy to Treat All Types of Varicoceles in the Pediatric Population: Experience of a Single Center.顺行硬化疗法治疗小儿各种类型精索静脉曲张:单中心经验
Urology. 2016 Dec;98:149-153. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.036. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Tauber's antegrade sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents. Does the pubertal stage matter?陶伯尔顺行硬化疗法治疗儿童和青少年精索静脉曲张。青春期阶段重要吗?
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 19;43(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05564-x.
2
Outcome following the surgical management of varicocele in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年精索静脉曲张手术治疗的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Urol. 2023 Oct 20;15:17562872231206239. doi: 10.1177/17562872231206239. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Varicoceles in Men With Non-obstructive Azoospermia: The Dilemma to Operate or Not.
非梗阻性无精子症男性的精索静脉曲张:手术与否的困境
Front Reprod Health. 2022 Apr 4;4:811487. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.811487. eCollection 2022.
4
Retroperitoneal Varix ligation with sclerotherapy: a prospective randomized comparative study.腹膜后静脉曲张结扎术联合硬化疗法:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):296-300. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1297. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
5
Adolescent varicocele: limited indications for treatment during puberty and adolescence.青少年精索静脉曲张:青春期和青少年期治疗的适应证有限。
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Dec;3(4):398-401. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.12.10.
6
The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery.精索静脉曲张手术的演变与改进
Asian J Androl. 2016 Mar-Apr;18(2):171-8. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.170866.
7
Large bowel infarct following antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for varicocele: A case report.精索静脉曲张顺行阴囊硬化治疗后发生大肠梗死:一例报告
Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Sep;8(9-10):E641-3. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1822.
8
Scrotal antegradesclerotherapy demonstrates anatomical variations on venous drainage in paediatric, adolescent and young adult varicoceles.阴囊顺行硬化疗法显示了小儿、青少年和年轻成人精索静脉曲张静脉引流的解剖学变异。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Jan;30(1):107-11. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3413-6. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
9
The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.评估青少年精索静脉曲张的血液动力学方法。
Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Mar 27;9(5):247-57. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.41.
10
Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility.男性不育的手术治疗技术。
Asian J Androl. 2012 Jan;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.62. Epub 2011 Nov 28.