Rautiainen Risto H, Ohsfeldt Robert, Sprince Nancy L, Donham Kelley J, Burmeister Leon F, Reynolds Stephen J, Saarimäki Pentti, Zwerling Craig
University of Iowa, College of Public Health, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Iowa City, IA, 52242-5000, USA.
J Agromedicine. 2005;10(3):21-9. doi: 10.1300/j096v10n03_03.
Although agriculture is one of the most hazardous industries, the costs of agricultural injuries and illnesses are not well known. This study aimed to determine the cost burden from compensated injuries and occupational diseases in Finnish agriculture using workers compensation records. The incidence rates in 1996 were 7.4/100 for injuries and 0.61/100 for occupational diseases. Men had a higher risk of injury (RR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.81-1.97), but a lower risk of an occupational disease (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.60-0.78), compared to women. The total cost burden was 75 (Euros) per person in 1983, increasing to 215 in 1999. The total insurance cost in 1996 was 23.5 million consisting of medical care (16%), per diem (lost time compensation within one year from the incident) (37%), pension (lost time compensation after one year from the incident) (23%), survivors pension (3%), impairment allowance (7%), rehabilitation (6%), and other costs (9%). The total cost was 0.7% of the national gross farm income and 2.2% of the net farm income. The mean cost of 1996 cases was 1340 for injuries and 6636 for occupational diseases. Injuries represented 92% of the claims and 71% of the total costs. Occupational diseases represented 8% of the claims and 29% of the costs. Twenty percent of the most severe claims represented 79.5% of the total insurance costs. Injuries and occupational diseases result in significant costs in agriculture. Lost time was the largest cost item. Overall, injuries were more costly than occupational diseases. This study indicates that the 20%-80% rule applies to agricultural injury and illness costs, and from the cost standpoint, it is important to focus prevention efforts on the most severe incidents.
尽管农业是最具危险性的行业之一,但农业工伤和疾病的成本却鲜为人知。本研究旨在利用工人赔偿记录确定芬兰农业中获得赔偿的工伤和职业病的成本负担。1996年,工伤发病率为7.4/100,职业病发病率为0.61/100。与女性相比,男性受伤风险更高(相对危险度=1.89;95%置信区间:1.81 - 1.97),但患职业病的风险更低(相对危险度=0.68;95%置信区间:0.60 - 0.78)。1983年人均总成本负担为75欧元,到1999年增至215欧元。1996年的总保险成本为2350万欧元,包括医疗护理(16%)、每日津贴(事故发生后一年内的误工赔偿)(37%)、养老金(事故发生一年后的误工赔偿)(23%)、遗属养老金(3%)、伤残津贴(7%)、康复费用(6%)以及其他费用(9%)。总成本占全国农业总收入的0.7%,占农业净收入的2.2%。1996年工伤案例的平均成本为1340欧元,职业病案例的平均成本为6636欧元。工伤索赔占索赔总数的92%,占总成本的71%。职业病索赔占索赔总数的8%,占成本的29%。最严重的20%索赔占总保险成本的79.5%。工伤和职业病给农业带来了巨大成本。误工是最大的成本项目。总体而言,工伤比职业病成本更高。本研究表明,20%-80%法则适用于农业工伤和疾病成本,从成本角度来看,将预防工作重点放在最严重的事故上非常重要。