Donham Kelley J, Rautiainen Risto H, Lange Jeffrey L, Schneiders Sara
Iowa's Center for Agricultural Safety and Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
J Rural Health. 2007 Autumn;23(4):348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00103.x.
The Certified Safe Farm (CSF) intervention program aims to reduce occupational injuries and illnesses, and promote wellness to reduce health care and related costs to farmers, insurers, and other stakeholders.
To evaluate the cost effectiveness of CSF.
Farms (316) located in a 9-county area of northwestern Iowa were recruited and randomized into intervention and control cohorts. Intervention farms received occupational health screenings, health and wellness screening, education, on-farm safety reviews, and performance incentives. For both cohorts, quarterly calls over 3 years were used to collect self-reported occupational injury and illness information, including costs to the farmers and their insurers.
Annual occupational injury and illness costs per farmer paid by insurers were 45% lower in the intervention cohort ($183) than in the control cohort ($332). Although out-of-pocket expenses were similar for both cohorts, combined costs of insurance and out-of-pocket expenses were 27% lower in the intervention cohort ($374/year per farmer) compared to the control cohort ($512/year per farmer). Within the cohort of intervention farmers, annual occupational injury and illness cost savings were directly associated with on-farm safety review scores. Reported health care costs were $237 per farmer in the safest farms (those farms scoring in the highest tertile) versus $485 per farmer in the least safe farms (lowest tertile).
Results suggest that farmers receiving the intervention had lower health care costs for occupational injuries and illnesses than control farmers. These cost savings more than cover the cost of providing CSF services (about $100 per farm per year).
认证安全农场(CSF)干预计划旨在减少职业伤害和疾病,促进健康,以降低农民、保险公司和其他利益相关者的医疗保健及相关成本。
评估CSF的成本效益。
招募了位于爱荷华州西北部9个县地区的316个农场,并将其随机分为干预组和对照组。干预农场接受职业健康筛查、健康与 wellness 筛查、教育、农场安全审查以及绩效激励。对于两组,在3年时间里每季度进行电话随访,以收集自我报告的职业伤害和疾病信息,包括农民及其保险公司的成本。
保险公司为干预组每个农民支付的年度职业伤害和疾病成本(183美元)比对照组(332美元)低45%。虽然两组的自付费用相似,但干预组保险和自付费用的综合成本(每个农民每年374美元)比对照组(每个农民每年512美元)低27%。在干预农民群体中,年度职业伤害和疾病成本节省与农场安全审查得分直接相关。报告的医疗保健成本在最安全的农场(得分处于最高三分位数的农场)为每个农民237美元,而在最不安全的农场(最低三分位数)为每个农民485美元。
结果表明,接受干预的农民因职业伤害和疾病产生的医疗保健成本低于对照组农民。这些成本节省足以覆盖提供CSF服务的成本(大约每个农场每年100美元)。