• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于椎间融合准备的脊柱终板射频消融术。

Coblation of spinal endplates in preparation for interbody spinal fusion.

作者信息

Aryan Henry E, Ames Christopher P, Szandera Bartek, Nguyen Andrew D, Acosta Frank L, Taylor William R

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), 200 West Arbor Drive, Suite 8893, San Diego, California 92103-8893, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2006 Apr;13(3):349-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.04.027. Epub 2006 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.04.027
PMID:16540328
Abstract

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) have become routine alternatives to intertransverse process fusion. The use of Coblation (ArthroCare Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA) allows for routine and reproducible removal of cartilaginous endplate down to the bony endplate. Our experience with this new technology is reviewed. The authors used Coblation to prepare endplates of 10 consecutive patients undergoing interbody fusion. The results were compared to the following 10 consecutive patients undergoing interbody fusion with endplates prepared in the standard fashion with curettes and rongeurs. The same interbody grafts and instrumentation were used in all patients. Follow-up X-rays were done at 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and then each year thereafter. The 20 patients were reviewed along with their films. In each patient the disk spaces and the ALIF/PLIF cages appeared to be fused by 6 months. There was one superficial wound infection in each group. In each of the cases in which PLIF was performed, the cages were augmented by posterior lateral graft and pedicle screw fixation. All patients in both groups reported improvement in pain and/or neurologic symptoms by 6 months. The patients were followed for 4.6 years in the Coblation group and 4.1 years in the standard group. Disk space height was measured in all patients at 6 months. In the Coblation group, average disk space height was 9.0 mm compared to 8.2 mm in the standard group (p<0.1). We feel that the maintenance of normal structures within the lumbar spine with anterior/posterior lumbar interbody fusions and non-mechanical means of preparing the endplates are advantageous. Clearly, the number of patients involved and the length of follow-up limit this study, but it serves as an early indicator that endplate preparation may play a role in graft subsidence and fusion rates. Additional study is warranted.

摘要

腰椎后路椎间融合术(PLIF)和腰椎前路椎间融合术(ALIF)已成为横突间融合术的常规替代方法。使用低温等离子消融术(ArthroCare公司,加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)可常规且可重复地将软骨终板去除至骨终板。本文回顾了我们在这项新技术方面的经验。作者使用低温等离子消融术为10例连续接受椎间融合术的患者准备终板。将结果与接下来10例连续接受椎间融合术且使用刮匙和咬骨钳以标准方式准备终板的患者进行比较。所有患者均使用相同的椎间融合器和器械。在术后1周、6周、6个月、1年及之后每年进行随访X线检查。对这20例患者及其影像学资料进行了评估。在每例患者中,椎间融合器间隙和ALIF/PLIF融合器在6个月时似乎均已融合。每组各有1例表浅伤口感染。在每例实施PLIF的病例中,融合器均通过后外侧植骨和椎弓根螺钉固定进行加强。两组所有患者均报告在6个月时疼痛和/或神经症状有所改善。低温等离子消融术组患者随访4.6年,标准组患者随访4.1年。在6个月时对所有患者测量椎间融合器间隙高度。低温等离子消融术组平均椎间融合器间隙高度为9.0mm,而标准组为8.2mm(p<0.1)。我们认为,通过腰椎前后路椎间融合术维持腰椎内正常结构以及采用非机械方式准备终板具有优势。显然,本研究涉及的患者数量和随访时间限制了研究结果,但它可作为一个早期指标,表明终板准备可能在移植物沉降和融合率中发挥作用。有必要进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Coblation of spinal endplates in preparation for interbody spinal fusion.用于椎间融合准备的脊柱终板射频消融术。
J Clin Neurosci. 2006 Apr;13(3):349-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2005.04.027. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
2
Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.采用局部自体移植的单节段后路腰椎椎间融合联合Prospace和小关节融合的初步应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Nov;21(11):1155-9.
3
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
4
[Instability of lower lumbar treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion with autologous iliac crest or interbody fusion cage: a comparative study].[自体髂嵴后路腰椎椎间融合术或椎间融合器治疗下腰椎不稳的对比研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Aug;22(8):928-32.
5
Is one cage enough in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of unilateral single cage interbody fusion to bilateral cages.后路腰椎椎间融合术中单枚椎间融合器是否足够:单侧单枚椎间融合器与双侧椎间融合器的比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Feb;20(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211251.59953.a4.
6
Subsidence of metal interbody cage after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation.后路腰椎椎间融合术联合椎弓根螺钉固定后金属椎间融合器下沉
Orthopedics. 2009 Apr;32(4).
7
Posterior versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior tension band plating: retrospective analysis.后路与前路腰椎椎间融合术联合前路张力带钢板固定:回顾性分析
Orthopedics. 2009 Jul;32(7):492. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090527-12.
8
Outcomes of L1-L2 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the Lumbar I/F cage and the variable screw placement system: reporting unexpected poor fusion results at L1-L2.使用腰椎I/F椎间融合器和可变螺钉置入系统进行L1-L2腰椎后路椎间融合的结果:报告L1-L2处意外的融合效果不佳
Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.011.
9
Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.L5-S1节段经皮轴向腰椎椎间融合术(AxiaLIF):初步临床及影像学经验
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;51(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080915.
10
Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes.通过将重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2(rhBMP-2)与同种异体骨相结合来加速腰椎融合:椎间融合率及临床结果的前瞻性分析
Spine J. 2007 May-Jun;7(3):301-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 Jan 2.