Fogel Guy R, Toohey John S, Neidre Arvo, Brantigan John W
South Texas Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery Associates, 9150 Huebner Road, San Antonio, TX 78240, USA.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Feb;20(1):60-5. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211251.59953.a4.
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), as recommended with bilateral lumbar interbody cages and pedicle screw fixation, has increased the successful fusion rate to nearly 100%. Presently, a unilateral approach to the disc space with a variant of PLIF, the trans-foraminal interbody fusion is often used. There are few clinical studies of unilateral interbody fusion. The clinical and fusion results of unilateral interbody fusion are important as the usage of trans-foraminal interbody fusion procedure increases. This retrospective study of 26 consecutive patients treated with a unilateral cage asks whether fusion healing and clinical outcome is comparable with that obtained with bilateral cages. In this study, there were no pseudarthroses, instrumentation failures, or significant subsidence at any of the single cage levels. Disc space height and foraminal height were restored by the surgery and maintained at last follow-up. Using Prolo scores, 23/26 patients had clinical success (88%), and 3 were unsuccessful. Fusion was successful at all single cage fusion levels and overall in 23/26 (88%) reviewing all levels of fusion. In conclusion, fusion and clinical success rates were not diminished by the use of a unilateral interbody cage rather than the recommended 2 cages. This retrospective comparative study is a Level III-2 Therapeutic Study investigating the results of unilateral PLIF with a single interbody cage compared with historical series with interbody cages.
后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF),如采用双侧腰椎椎间融合器及椎弓根螺钉固定,已将成功融合率提高至近100%。目前,一种采用PLIF变体的单侧入路椎间盘间隙手术,即经椎间孔椎间融合术经常被使用。关于单侧椎间融合的临床研究较少。随着经椎间孔椎间融合术的应用增加,单侧椎间融合的临床及融合结果至关重要。这项对26例连续接受单侧融合器治疗患者的回顾性研究,探讨融合愈合及临床结果是否与双侧融合器相当。在本研究中,任何单节段融合器水平均未出现假关节形成、内固定失败或明显下沉。手术恢复了椎间盘高度及椎间孔高度,并在末次随访时得以维持。采用普罗洛评分,26例患者中有23例(88%)临床成功,3例不成功。所有单节段融合器融合水平均成功融合,回顾所有融合节段时,26例中有23例(88%)总体融合成功。总之,使用单侧椎间融合器而非推荐的双侧融合器,融合及临床成功率并未降低。这项回顾性对照研究是一项III - 2级治疗性研究,调查单节段椎间融合器单侧PLIF与椎间融合器历史系列研究的结果。