Klareskog L, Gaubitz M, Rodriguez-Valverde V, Malaise M, Dougados M, Wajdula J
Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm 17176, Sweden.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Dec;65(12):1578-84. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.038349. Epub 2006 Mar 15.
To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
549 patients entered this 5-year, open-label extension study and received etanercept 25 mg twice weekly. All patients showed inadequate responses to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs before entry into the double-blind studies. Safety assessments were carried out at regular intervals. Primary efficacy end points were the numbers of painful and swollen joints; secondary variables included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rate, Disease Activity Score and acute-phase reactants. Efficacy was analysed using the last-observation-carried-forward approach.
Of the 549 patients enrolled in the open-label trial, 467 (85%), 414 (75%) and 371 (68%) completed 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively; 363 (66%) remained in the study at the time of this analysis. A total exposure of 1498 patient-years, including the double-blind study, was accrued. In the open-label trial, withdrawals for efficacy-related and safety-related reasons were 11% and 13%, respectively. Frequent adverse events included upper respiratory infections, flu syndrome, rash and injection-site reactions. Rates of serious infections and malignancies remained unchanged over the course of the study; there were no reports of patients with central demyelinating disease or serious blood dyscrasias. After 3 years, ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were 78%, 51% and 27%, respectively. The Disease Activity Score score was reduced to 3.0 at 3 months and 2.6 at 3 years from 5.1. A sustained improvement was found in Health Assessment Questionnaire scores throughout the 3-year time period.
After 3 years of treatment, etanercept showed sustained efficacy and a favourable safety profile.
评估依那西普治疗类风湿关节炎患者的长期安全性和疗效。
549例患者进入这项为期5年的开放标签扩展研究,接受每周两次25mg依那西普治疗。所有患者在进入双盲研究前对改善病情抗风湿药物反应不佳。定期进行安全性评估。主要疗效终点为疼痛和肿胀关节的数量;次要变量包括美国风湿病学会(ACR)反应率、疾病活动评分和急性期反应物。采用末次观察结转法分析疗效。
在开放标签试验中登记的549例患者中,分别有467例(85%)、414例(75%)和371例(68%)完成了1年、2年和3年的治疗;在本次分析时,363例(66%)仍在研究中。包括双盲研究在内,累计总暴露时间为1498患者年。在开放标签试验中,因疗效相关和安全相关原因退出的比例分别为11%和13%。常见不良事件包括上呼吸道感染、流感样综合征、皮疹和注射部位反应。严重感染和恶性肿瘤的发生率在研究过程中保持不变;没有中枢脱髓鞘疾病或严重血液系统疾病患者的报告。3年后,ACR20、ACR50和ACR70反应率分别为78%、51%和27%。疾病活动评分从5.1降至3个月时的3.0和3年时的2.6。在整个3年期间,健康评估问卷评分持续改善。
治疗3年后,依那西普显示出持续疗效和良好的安全性。